Stranded divers 'lucky to be alive'

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Some more details from the divers themselves:

Monday September 19, 01:48 PM AAP
Divers made pact not to look down

Two British divers who spent about six hours stranded on the Great Barrier Reef made a pact not to look down again after they saw a shark circling them.
Louise Woodger, 29, and Gordon Pratley, 31, were rescued about 4pm (AEST) on Saturday, after strong currents apparently swept them away from their dive boat.

The couple had entered the water about 10am, but when they surfaced, they saw their dive boat Sea-Esta as a "speck in the distance" before it disappeared from view, Ms Woodger's mother Jane has said.

"Louise said it was just a great expanse of water," Jane Woodger told the Press Association from her home at Mildenhall in Suffolk.

"They held each other and when they got cold they swam around to try and get warm.

"They said they looked down at one point and saw a shark circling beneath. They made a decision between themselves not to look down anymore."

The couple has told Queensland police of their relief when the shark left them alone during their ordeal near Wheeler Reef, north-east of Townsville.

Townsville police acting inspector Greg Doyle said the shark swam in circles around the Britons, who were eventually rescued 10km from where they entered the water.

"When they were interviewed by the CIB (police) yesterday .... they mentioned that at one stage a shark did show some interest in them but thankfully it swam away without prying any further," he told ABC radio.

"So they were very thankful for that."

Coast guard commander Richard Bolton said the couple realised early on that they were stranded.

"They came to the surface after three quarters of an hour and realised they'd drifted away from their boat," he told ABC radio.

"They started to look after themselves, they inflated their vests so they could remain afloat, stay together.

"Had the search gone longer, another couple of hours it would have been after dark but everything was going their way."

Police are expected to interview crew and passengers from the boat later.
The couple suffered exhaustion and mild hypothermia during their ordeal, which sparked and air and sea search after the skipper raised the alarm following a head count.

Jane Woodger said the couple could see rescue helicopters and boats searching for them, but they could not attract their attention.

They were finally found by their dive boat, she said.

"When they were pulled onto the boat they were quite calm and I think they were quite shocked to see how euphoric everybody was on the boat because they had been found," she said.

"I don't think they'd realised quite how emotional they would be.

"It doesn't seem to have put them off diving. She (Louise) said they were planning to go out on another dive to a wreck in a couple of days' time."

New dive safety procedures introduced after the disappearance of American couple Tom and Eileen Lonergan in 1998 have been credited with helping save the Britons.

The Lonergans' disappearance was not reported for two days, and they were never found.

The incident sparked a tightening of safety regulations for dive boats.

Dive Queensland spokesman Col McKenzie said the rescue of the British tourists showed the new procedures were working.

"This is a very good example of where it did go to plan," Mr McKenzie told the Seven network.

"The Lonergans were missed for some 48 hours (before the alarm was raised), in this case we knew that these people were missed within 30 minutes."

The British couple is spending two years in Australia before returning home to get married





What I love about this is that they are already planning their next dives - you've gotta admire that sort of attitude...

Sounds like they allowed themselves to be swept a long way away from the boat before finally surfacing. Without knowing the site or the conditions its hard to be too judgmental though.

Cheers,
Rohan.
 
AAP:
Jane Woodger said the couple could see rescue helicopters and boats searching for them, but they could not attract their attention.
Bet they were kicking themselves for not having a mirror or other signalling devices.
 
Scubaroo:
Bet they were kicking themselves for not having a mirror or other signalling devices.

I guess it's the lax nature of tropical locations. In the North Sea you'll be lucky to find a boat to take you if you don't have at least a safety sausage with you.
 
just wanted to add my 2 cents worth to this as an australian and avid GBR diver... most of the "headcounts" that are done in QLD now involve you signing your time and your buddy out as you step off the boat. As soon as you are back on the dive platform you have to physically sign back in with your time and depth (no reverse profiling here!!). It was these procedures that saved these divers, so while there may be a better system at least the one we have worked in this case.
 
charlie78:
just wanted to add my 2 cents worth to this as an australian and avid GBR diver... most of the "headcounts" that are done in QLD now involve you signing your time and your buddy out as you step off the boat. As soon as you are back on the dive platform you have to physically sign back in with your time and depth (no reverse profiling here!!). It was these procedures that saved these divers, so while there may be a better system at least the one we have worked in this case.

Good point Charlie78,

Nowadays, we've often got other physical reminders, e.g. numbered tags for each diver entering the water...numbers correspond to places on the dive log...all tags must be accounted and replaced on the log as divers exit the water and sign the log
 
I'd be interested to know how they ended up so far from the boat, if they drifted that distance, or whether the boat moved away from them, to pick up other divers etc.
 
The story in all the aussie papers/sites is that there was a higer tide then expected that resulted in a strong current between two reefs and they drifted..
 
charlie78:
just wanted to add my 2 cents worth to this as an australian and avid GBR diver... most of the "headcounts" that are done in QLD now involve you signing your time and your buddy out as you step off the boat. As soon as you are back on the dive platform you have to physically sign back in with your time and depth (no reverse profiling here!!). It was these procedures that saved these divers, so while there may be a better system at least the one we have worked in this case.

That's it? One would think that more robust procedures would be required other than a more effective head count. Aren't divers required to have signaling devices?
 
In a radio interview today the woman stated that they surfaced early after encountering strong current and were already some distance from the boat, and they assumed that no-one saw them surface because they surfaced so early in the dive already at a distance. They basically inflated their BCs and drifted as getting back to the boat was impossible.
 
What would be the rescue procedures if the boat crew had noticed the divers surfacing early at a distance? Should the crew go after those divers then return to pick up the remaining divers or notify authorities, recover divers at the dive site first, then go after the lost divers or ....

Thanks,
Vince
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/perdix-ai/

Back
Top Bottom