Zach The Diver
Contributor
A thought I had a while ago…
There’s a huge disparity in many dive signals and how they’re taught. This is most prominent in how “gas remaining” is communicated and seems to vary based on geography, agency, and sometimes even instructor. This has lead to plenty of confusion- for instance the “count by fives” method of communicating remaining gas is easy to misconstrue (you may miss one signal or count an extra one and have an incorrect idea of your partner’s remaining gas).
Some dive situations (minimal visibility or ambient light, for instance) may render certain methods of communication inconvenient or inappropriate to use.
I know that this is what a predive briefing is for. Nevertheless, I think that there should be an industry-wide, standardized approach to this for a multitude of reasons. One is what I had already stated above, but another aspect to consider is the need to communicate aptly and appropriately during an emergency. It’s easy to forget “what was briefed” and revert to old habits when you are task-loaded or stressed, and such mishaps are not what you want during a potential life-or-death situation.
I recognize that some variation may be appropriate- such as signaling “Okay!” with a controlled spin of a light instead of a hand signal on a night dive, but these types of variations are usually maintained as alternate methods of communicating an idea and not a “replacement”. If anyone sees
in any dive situation there is no chance of misunderstanding its meaning.
There’s a huge disparity in many dive signals and how they’re taught. This is most prominent in how “gas remaining” is communicated and seems to vary based on geography, agency, and sometimes even instructor. This has lead to plenty of confusion- for instance the “count by fives” method of communicating remaining gas is easy to misconstrue (you may miss one signal or count an extra one and have an incorrect idea of your partner’s remaining gas).
Some dive situations (minimal visibility or ambient light, for instance) may render certain methods of communication inconvenient or inappropriate to use.
I know that this is what a predive briefing is for. Nevertheless, I think that there should be an industry-wide, standardized approach to this for a multitude of reasons. One is what I had already stated above, but another aspect to consider is the need to communicate aptly and appropriately during an emergency. It’s easy to forget “what was briefed” and revert to old habits when you are task-loaded or stressed, and such mishaps are not what you want during a potential life-or-death situation.
I recognize that some variation may be appropriate- such as signaling “Okay!” with a controlled spin of a light instead of a hand signal on a night dive, but these types of variations are usually maintained as alternate methods of communicating an idea and not a “replacement”. If anyone sees
