The thickness of my skin is irrelevant to the discussion, just as it's wrong to assume I'm not willing to have my procedures and assumptions questioned. I don't think it's unreasonable (though perhaps a bit old-fashioned) to expect civility and polite manners in any conversation, however. At their best, ad hominem attacks are usually the sign of a weak argument, at their worst they're often a sign of a weak mind.JeffG:You have amazingly thin skin or is it that you do not like your "procedures" questioned?
There are three reasons people participate in these discussions: they want to learn, they want to teach, or they want to win. I've respect for the first, appreciation of the second and no use for the third. I don't believe that anyone thinks learning or teaching are facilitated by insults, which would leave only one option available for those that employ them.
We may disagree but being disagreeable serves no noble purpose.