No. Two things can be true at the same time. For you to try to draw this illogical conclusion shows a very weak mind.
It does, but you're not thinking on a statistical level where there is no true and false, there are only partial correlations meaning Causality. Hence I wonder who's been weak here.
Your hypothesis "Dauin is a TOP5 macro BECAUSE it has numerous WS" translates into a statistical model where the criteria "Numerous WS" should be driving the result of the model :
Egypt (lots of WS, more convienence, lower dive quality) and Malpelo/PNG (fewer WS, less ocnvenience, higher quality) show the correlation between the number of worshops and the convenience factor is higher than the inherent quality of the spot factor (in clear the Student indicator in this model would be higher for the convenience criteria than for the quality criteria).
One workshop in Solomons or in PNG only scores a little against the numerous WS in Egypt. It's not because ther is one or two WS that it doesn't work, once again it's a matter of correlation not YES or NO.
Coincidentally you cannot prove that Dauin is a top5 macro site simply by looking at the number of workshops (which was your ONLY argument since you refuse to described what is unique... We all know the reason it's because it's pure invention on your part.) because you also and firstly need to look at the convenience factor.
Hence your initial hypothesis of CAUSALITY is contradicted.
I absolutely agree it could be AND (Dauin can be convenient AND a TOP5 site) but then your demonstration through the "proxy" is moot because we've seen that its carried mostly by the conveinence factor. So you'd need to identify another cause BUT you dont' mention anything that proves it. That would be listing the critters you find for instance and describing the uniqueness of Dauin (since it's the other criteria you seem to put forward).
But you are weirdly refusing that since the beginning of the discussion.
You see for instance :
In a debate - if somone tries to make a definitive point, you may refute that point through a single example, you never need to address all possible examples. You listed PNG in your list, I gave you an obvious example in return.
What you pretend is typical binary thinking. Y/N or 0/1.
It doesnt' work like this with statistics and if it were (then it wouldn't be statistics) in this fictional world you would have ALL the workshops concentrated on one destination. Which is obviously not the case.
It would like if any candidate of an election had ONE vote, he would proclaim himself a winner.
You're just thinking with the wrong tools : you must think correlation testing.
---------
As a side note, you showed in your reply that you're so infatuated you think that what you don't understand cannot be understood by others. I have consciously avoided to say anything on yourself personally as a real person.
I'll do an exception here : I think this is you're showing the face of a petty minded person, considering other people with both blinders and contempt.
You can be adverse to opinions and ideas (I like or don't like this, you disagree and argue this is fine) but whoever you think you are It doesn't allow you to give any judgment on a real person you are talking too and you know zilch about. You have even put into doubt my skills at a job which you don't know absolutely nothing about. You have never met me, I don't have any prospect to meet you as well and you'd most probably look at your feet if you had that discussion in private with me.
Once again, If you have personal problem with me, I encourage you to contact me by PM rather than showing ugly faces in public and sorting names.
Now if you want to be useful for people, I am convinced (as I was from the start) that you will never list anything detailed about Dauin and Mabul.
You have a request on the other post about pristine spot, may be you can have a try.
