solo diving

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

First, I must tell you that I do occasionally dive alone - usually very early in the morning when no one else is willing to get up and go. - BUT -
When I do, I am betting my life that I will not get entrapped, and that I will not have some unanticipated incapacitating episode on that dive. These two are independent of redundancy, and while conservatism can all but eliminate entrapment, the risk of sudden incapacitation can only be marginally reduced.
I will provide two recent, local (Lower Alabama), specific examples which may help you make up your own mind when considering whether it is "safe" to go it alone.
(1) One of my boyhood friends was cleaning his pond - alone, in just over five feet of water. He had some kind of attack - probably stroke or heart attack - and drowned. We will never know if he could have been saved from the attack because he drowned first. Had he had a buddy, he would likely not have drowned. This man was in "excellent shape" - trim, ate right, regular exercise, superior swimmer and diver. Still, we buried him.
(2) Two spearfishermen were diving from a boat out of Gulf Shores - on the first dive, one had equipment problems on entry and elected to abort the dive. The other decided to go on solo. About fifteen minutes later, the boat driver and the other diver saw a huge freeflow of bubbles at the surface, followed shortly by the diver popping up, drowned. CPR failed. When he popped to the surface, he was wrapped up in the shaft line of the speargun, regulator out of his mouth and both arms pinned with the line. We believe he shot a big amberjack that wrapped him up and knocked the regulator out of his mouth - unable to get to his primary or independent second regulator and unable to jettison his weights, he'd started an emergency swimming ascent (we don't know how long the fish stayed on the spear and what affect that had on his efforts to get free/up); the last conscious thing he was able to do was get free enough to reach his power inflator, too late. Had he had a buddy, he would likely not have drowned. Again, he was in excellent shape, an experienced diver and spearfisherman (although obviously not experienced enough to shoot only things small enough for him to handle alone), and still died.
Note that in both these cases there was no equipment failure, no lack of redundancy, no deficiency in training or in fitness to dive. The incapacitation in the first case was a complete surprise; the entrapment in the second avoidable but nevertheless unexpected. In either case a buddy would likely have prevented the drowning.
Rick
 
I think everyone agrees there are greater risks in solo diving. That said, I have done a few solo dives, and am usually much more conservative, knowing that I am alone. It is true that sudden incapacitation is where a buddy would definitely come in handy, but again, it just comes down to the level of risk you are willing to accept. First example - I dove with an inexperienced buddy who could't control his buoyancy and started an uncontrolled ascent. I followed him up, not at the same speed but still far faster than I would normally ascend, as I was concerned about him. We were in about 60fsw. Had it been 120fsw, we both would have been in trouble. In this case, a buddy was more of a liability for me (but helpful to the other person). Second example. My grandfather was home alone, and out mowing the back lawn. He had a heart attack and died. Had someone else been home, there is a much better chance that he would still be here. Am I saying that you should never mow the lawn unsupervised? no. But technically, it is riskier than mowing while someone else is home. The dangers of incapacitation while alone happen all the time, [even driving to work] and in most cases a buddy would have helped. I'm just saying that having a buddy is almost always better, but that doesn't mean that diving solo is inherently unsafe. I always dive with the intent of not relying on anyone, even though most of my dives are with a buddy. All of my solo dives have been just lobstering in open water close to the boat in 20-25 feet. Even though thsoe dives are very shallow, I don't treat it lightly when I'm alone.
 
I've soloed a few times but I find that it is always more enjoyable with a friend.For me diving is not just a personal sport but a social one also.Part of the experience is the bragging afterwards about what you saw while you were down below and I wouldn't swap that for all the tea in china.
As the others have said,you can't have a hard and fast rule about how to do a solo dive.All of the agencies advise against that and it's for a good reason.There are very few people who can handle it!I have met only a couple of divers in my time with whom I would be reasonably confident that they have the experience and ability to dive solo regularly.
These guys are master instructors and even they prefer to dive with others.
At the end of the day you must weigh up the risks,not only to yourself but to your loved ones and those who would have to clean up the mess.It's not a nice thing to do a body search,I can tell you.
If your not experienced then just don't do it and stick within your limits.
Stay smart,stay safe and stay in the water.
The Gasman.
 

Back
Top Bottom