Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
catherine96821:Ugh, where? avoid those places, there are probably other problematic regulations for me. Regulatory hell, one of my deepest fears.
Which is demonstrably misleading and only true of poorly done buddy diving. I don't doubt that the buddy system as applied by the author is flawed but there are other ways. The fix for a flawed buddy system is to adress the flaws, not to do away with the team. LOL the authors logic seems flawed to me.Second, the buddy system is deeply flawed. It fosters dependent behavior in many divers and is proven not to enhance safety. In fact, it may do just the opposite for many divers forced into the role of buddy.
The "Helper" Myth
Besides being forced to by operators, perhaps the only reason many divers remained tethered to the buddy system is the "it's safer!" claim: Two divers can help each other in the event of injury, panic or equipment failure. Unfortunately, dive accident statistics and actual reports tell a much different story. In reality, buddy partnerships fail more often than they succeed. The reasons: Buddy diving encourages dominant and passive roles, one diver's ability to help the other is negated by separation or inattention, and few buddies have the actual experience or skills to assist another diver in the sudden onset of equipment failure, panic or an out-of-air situation.
catherine96821:because I am not? and I want to buy other stuff? where are they Paul, very curious? you always have the scoop, wish I was well read.