lucca brassi
Contributor
Just switch from Aladin Tech 2g to Suunto Vyper Novo. Like it !
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
As a newbie diver, I want to add another post to this thread, addressed to other newbies who may come along after me and bother to read this thread.
I have been diving for 9 months and have just completed my 35th dive. I actually did 5 dives off the Outer Banks of North Carolina this weekend, so dive #s 31 - 35.
In the 9 months since I got certified, I have had a number of discussions on this board with older, more experienced members about dive computers. Specifically, about dive computers for new Recreational divers and the importance (or non-importance) of the algorithm the computer uses. I have been told time and again that the relative conservatism or liberalism of the computer does not matter - especially to new divers buying their first computer. Many of the "old hands" on here insisted that one reason it doesn't matter is that I (and other new divers) won't be hitting my "No Decompression Limits" anyway because I'll run out of air first. Thus, liberal or conservative doesn't matter because I'll be coming up for air before even a conservative computer tells me to anyway.
This post is to say that, despite all the words of wisdom that liberal or conservative does not matter, I did a lot of research before I bought my first dive computer and I bought one that, based on my research, is among the most liberal computers you can get - an Oceanic Atom 3.0. And I dive with it set to the more liberal of the two algorithms it supports, and with no "conservatism factor" set.
With that (most liberal) computer, I did 5 dives that past weekend, with a shallowest dive of 64 feet (the wreck of the Suloide), and 3 dives over 110 feet (the U-352, the Spar, and the Aeolus). And on all 5 dives, I went right up to within 1 to 3 minutes of my NDL before beginning my ascent, diving Nitrox mixes from 28 to 31 percent, depending on the dive. The least amount of gas I got back on the boat with was 920 psi. The most was 1440 psi (I might have had a little more NDL than 3 minutes left on that one when I began my ascent - but it was still a 28 minute dive with an average depth of 75 feet and max of 111). This data is all according to my data downloaded from my Atom to SubSurface, which includes gas data from the wireless Air Integration transmitter.
Now, I'm not some Superman of diving gas efficiency. I simply chose to find some good deals and buy HP120 tanks for myself. But, I could have used 100s and still had more than 500psi left on even the dive where I used the most gas (78 cu ft).
The point:
I feel vindicated in saying that even a brand new diver should consider the algorithm used by any computer they are contemplating to purchase. They should educate themselves on how THAT computer performs on calculating NDLs for initial dives and repetitive dives (i.e. second and subsequent dives in the same 24 hour period). It's not the black magic that some preach. it's math and science, and the data is out there. And potential computer buyers should be aware of the ramifications if they choose to buy a computer that is "more conservative."
I don't think I'm anything special. Therefore, I think that there will be plenty of other new divers like me that will come along and who would actually benefit (by getting more bottom time) from choosing a computer that uses an algorithm that will allow them more No Deco Limit time. They may not get that benefit in their first 10 dives. Maybe not in the first 20 or 30 or 40. But, why spend money on a computer that you'll outgrow after even 50 dives? Or at least, why do that unwittingly? Based on the research and lab testing, which I posted links to before, I am really glad that, when I did my second dive to 112' yesterday, after a 1:30 surface interval, I was able to get an enjoyable amount of time on the Aeolus - which I do not believe I would have gotten if I had had certain other "more conservative" recreational dive computers.
To be extra clear, before people start piling on saying I'm an ignorant idiot, I am NOT saying that people should only buy the most liberal computer. I am saying that people should have all the info available to them, so that they can make THEIR OWN INFORMED DECISION about what computer to buy and why. Telling people "don't worry about that. It won't matter to you for a long time" is peddling pablum. It seems to me that scuba diving should absolutely be about people learning about, making, and taking responsibility for their own decisions - not "trusting" the advice of more experienced people JUST because that person has more pages filled out in their log book. People whose advice is "trust me. This is what you want. That difference there doesn't matter for you," with no actual explanation of why - or worse, explanations that don't actually survive contact with reality (e.g. "that doesn't matter because you won't be hitting your NDLs any time soon"), are fostering a culture of ignorance and "trust me" divers. New divers should "trust" the old hands because those old hands give them logical, fact-based explanations for why they endorse a certain way of doing something. Not because "I'm more experienced and I say so."
I may be one, but I do not believe all new divers are stupid idiots. And I believe that talking to them as if they are - which seems to be the default mode for a number of people on here (presumed an idiot until proven otherwise) - does a disservice to new divers, to ScubaBoard, and to the entire scuba community.
And that is all just the opinion and experience of one newbie diver. So, take it for what it's worth. Which is to say, DON'T take my word for it. Do your own research and make your own decisions about what's important to you. Don't just blindly accept anyone else's word (including mine) about what is important. I think it's ALL important - right up until YOU decide that it's not important for YOU.
I think the list you referenced is complete. I hope so. I've only ever heard of Suunto computers doing it until the AWU came out. Definitely not a fan of that feature. I use dive computers to have information available to guide me to the surface as safely as possible. A DC ceasing to function as a DC in mid-dive is completely unacceptable.In light of a current discussion, I feel like this thread should have some reference somewhere for a list of dive computers that can/will stop showing you your NDL/deco info DURING a dive, under any circumstance.
Appreciate the info on the Ultra 2. I did not know thisIn light of a current discussion, I feel like this thread should have some reference somewhere for a list of dive computers that can/will stop showing you your NDL/deco info DURING a dive, under any circumstance.
The Apple Watch Ultra (and v2) with the Oceanic app will do that.
Now I'm told that some models of Suunto will also do it.
Essentially, stopping working during a dive, by design, is a characteristic I would consider to be totally unacceptable in a dive computer. When people come to this forum to learn more when shopping for a computer, I think it would be a boon to the community to share awareness of this issue, so that people can make a well-informed choice before plunking out their money.
The Apple Ultra 2 will display information until 40 msw, but continue to track your dive down to 44 msw. Below that, the depth sensor won't function anymore, and it won't be able to provide any data to the algorithm. Of course, 44 msw is well beyond the recreational dive limit, so you shouldn't be getting anywhere near that depth anyway.Appreciate the info on the Ultra 2. I did not know this