OldNSalty
Contributor
There you go OP, capture a Spanish hog fish and release it next time you see that pesky turtle.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Wookie, you interpreted differently than my intent.
I think it is important for divers to know that THEY should not do certain things. However, I think the reasons for this need to be clear, and not fictitious.
Divers should know it would be illegal for them to touch a turtle, or to attempt to remove a barnacle. But...
Florida Statutes (F.A.C. Rule 68E-1) restrict the take, possession, disturbance, mutilation, destruction, selling, transference, molestation, and harassment of marine turtles, nests or eggs. Protection is also afforded to marine turtle habitat. A specific authorization from Commission staff is required to conduct scientific, conservation, or educational activities that directly involve marine turtles in or collected from Florida, their nests, hatchlings or parts thereof, regardless of applicant's possession of any federal permit.No it isn't. That is not what the law says. It's a felony to *kill* a turtle, not to kill a barnacle. Nor does the statute you cite (or any other I'm aware of) make it a felony to *touch* a turtle. (A turtle *nest* or *egg* would be a different story.)
There's a bizarre tendency among scuba divers (and floridians, i might add) to post links to laws they haven't read, and plainly don't understand, and then to try to give other divers advice, which is plainly nonsense, based on the same.
Anyway, googling elsewhere provided an actually *informed* answer, which is that a multitude of barnacles may be a health problem for a sea turtle, but a small number on the shell is not.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
No, I am saying that if it is CLEAR that the animal would die without assistance, then there is no felony. It is protecting and saving.So, you're saying that the professionals concluded that you'd committed a felony but they decided not to report you?
And you're also confessing that you are a felon, that you committed a felony?
.
No, I am saying that if it is CLEAR that the animal would die without assistance, then there is no felony. It is protecting and saving.
Not quite sure why you are getting so annoyed by people here that are being neighborly enough to try and help...