properly planned solo dives by people that have the training and experience from the TDI/SDI course (or other technical training) is a whole different issue.
So the fact that it a course supported by TDI/SDI should put it on par with DIR - right? (If you think I'm wrong, please show me the light that illuminates the difference - legally - between these 2 SCUA organizations - remember, legally.)
[1] At one time, mixed gasses (Nitrox, Trimix) were not accepted practices (arguments were made that you'd die from such stuff). Now it is taught, accepted, and recognized as the "best" way to perform some dives (even some rec dives in the case of Nitrox and dives beyond 60 fsw). Things change. Have an open mind and examine things more carefully.
[2] Could an attorney use the lack of information (yet the mention of such techniques - such as solo diving) as a means to prove some liability. IE - you knew this, but witheld the information, or banned the discussion, such that you contributed to the death for not having provided more ample warrnings and information around the risks and how to avoid them (for those who are certified) as well as where to get the certification, etc. I don't know the answer(s) to this, but I'm curious if there is not some issue here.
[3] You have a forum on technical diving, mixed gases, etc. These are properly trained forums and do not suggest to anyone that the untrained can use the information to "dive" this way. Yet, those who argue that solo diving is different, and that it leads to liability, do not rcognize the correlation to the certification given from TDI/SDI. Tell me how this is different?
By all accounts, Pete should lock down every forum and only provide a forum for "safe" rec dives less than 60 fsw (the lowest common denominator on this board - OW cert.)
Someone please fill in the blanks here!