CuzzA
Wetwork for Hire
They would have the exact same amount of failure points. So a transmitter does not equal higher risk of failure.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
So you are suggesting an AI transmitter isn't a large device with more complication than a blanking plug with more chance of getting hit?
Especially if you put it on a hose!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Floating around exploring, no real task. But during a task I would not bother to check my SPG or my DC for air remaining if that's what you're steering at. I know how much air is left at any time by quite accurate guestimate. Still see no need for AI because checking air on my SPG or on my DC remains basically the same activity, i.e. interpret a measuring device. Unclipping an clipping my SPG is second nature to me, it does not mean any significant taskload and costs just seconds.What did you do during that dive? Were you actually doing a task or just floating around exploring?
I have to disgree with that. A blind plug is very unlikely to blow. A hose or a measuring device that is under high pressure has a higher risk it will blow.This I have to disagree with. If the first stage has a hole in it, it's a failure point. Regardless if it's being utilized for another piece of equipment or not.
Floating around exploring, no real task. But during a task I would not bother to check my SPG or my DC for air remaining if that's what you're steering at. I know how much air is left at any time by quite accurate guestimate. Still see no need for AI because checking air on my SPG or on my DC remains basically the same activity, i.e. interpret a measuring device. Unclipping an clipping my SPG is second nature to me, it does not mean any significant taskload and costs just seconds.
I have to disgree with that. A blind plug is very unlikely to blow. A hose or a measuring device that is under high pressure has a higher risk it will blow.
I have written about this several times. The notion that including AI software or circuits in a computer reduces the reliability of a computer is so thoroughly debunked as to be ridiculous at this point. There are no and I repeat no documented instances of a computer failing to operate as a computer (ie tracking depth, time, and NDL/deco) due to the presence of AI circuits or software. This is with the hundreds of thousands (maybe over a million by now?) of AI computers out there, over many years and millions of dives. . . .