So you are saying that this sort of learning is important for new OW divers who are getting their first certifications?
Of course, Haldane is not used anywhere any more, so your previous post agreed that gradient factors should be part of beginning scuba training. That means that Buhlmann needs to be taught as well. Can you explain how this benefits the average new diver looking to dive on an upcoming vacation to a tropical resort?
Getting a proper understanding of physics and physiology allowed me to start diving with confidence. Of course I was employing pre-calculated US Navy tables, but I had enough knowledge for being able to build them myself, if I had wished.
It is the same approach as teaching how the engine of your car works in a driving course. You do not really need to understand the difference between Otto and Diesel cycles, or to appreaciate the advantage or disadvantage of a two-stroke motorbike over a 4-stroke one.
But these are topics which are taught in driving school, because they improved the awareness of the driver.
A better and deeper knowledge is always advantageous.
The main reason for which Padi (then followed by other agencies) did remove such a deep training from OW courses is that this way they managed to sell more courses, getting much more money.
After an OW course like the one I had in 1975 there was no need to spend money in further courses, it was just needed to gain experience diving.
After a number of dives, one could go deeper and deeper, make repeating dives in the same day, switch from pure oxygen rebreathers to mixed-gas rebreathers, start using pure oxygen for accelerated deco, etc.
All the basics were already acquired...