SeaFlea
Contributor
Hello everyone. I've read several threads concerning the Spare Air system and while my investigation was prompted by my thoughts of buying one, I would like to ask a question.
I thought the idea behind Spare Air was to give a few breaths to allow a person, in the event of a regulator failure, to ascend to the surface. Is this not correct? Many posters feel that the 3.0 cuft of air isn't enough. Enough for what I ask. I'm sure we would like to include a safety stop on the way up but isn't getting to the surface the end goal? I think 20 or 25 breaths is adequate for a normal ascent from 75 ft or so. One reason I ask is after investigating the price of a 13 or 20 cuft bottle, a regulator, and a decent strapping system, I find the cost to be more than twice the cost of a Spare Air. For 200 usd I can get a new 3.0 cuft SA. At 50-80 ft thats good for at least 20 breaths.
Are my facts right? Is a redundant air supply for a recreational diver that seldom exceeds 80 ft (photographer) overkill? I dive with a ScubaPro Mk25/s600 and have it serviced every year.
Thx for your thoughts.
I thought the idea behind Spare Air was to give a few breaths to allow a person, in the event of a regulator failure, to ascend to the surface. Is this not correct? Many posters feel that the 3.0 cuft of air isn't enough. Enough for what I ask. I'm sure we would like to include a safety stop on the way up but isn't getting to the surface the end goal? I think 20 or 25 breaths is adequate for a normal ascent from 75 ft or so. One reason I ask is after investigating the price of a 13 or 20 cuft bottle, a regulator, and a decent strapping system, I find the cost to be more than twice the cost of a Spare Air. For 200 usd I can get a new 3.0 cuft SA. At 50-80 ft thats good for at least 20 breaths.
Are my facts right? Is a redundant air supply for a recreational diver that seldom exceeds 80 ft (photographer) overkill? I dive with a ScubaPro Mk25/s600 and have it serviced every year.
Thx for your thoughts.