LiteHedded
Contributor
Fair enough.You make a valid point and one that I have struggled with and tried to understand since I saw the download of my NiTek Duo computer from the dive that day. Let me say up front that I have no definitive explanation. However having thought about it for all these years I have few possible explanations which may sound like BS to you, because it kinda does to me.
One scenario I have come up with is that the sampling time of that computer which was set at 30 seconds simply did not record the brief time I needed to spend watching Shannon ascend to the log and wave us off.
It’s also been suggested that this minor discrepancy may be due to a calibration error of the computer. I am not offering these as absolute proof for the depth I was at as I simply don’t understand it.
The bottom line for me and I think should be for you is that Dave Flick, my student and the only other living eyewitness supported my version under oath in his deposition. He told the same story I am telling you and he had no reason to lie.
30' or 55' it doesn't make a whole heck of a lot of difference. I think everyone learned a lot from this incident and a lot of folks took a long look at how they handle situations like this. And I think that's a good thing