Ishie
Guest
James Goddard:There is very active damage being done to this man's reputation and career. It may very well be deserved, but allowing him to defend himself pending verification will at worst delay the truth.
What 'truth' is that? And if, as would be common practice on the internet, the original post was in his name but had not come from him, would that not do worse things to his reputation? Are you saying they should leave up a post that may not have been his?
"That may be your feeling but until you've personally experienced both sides of that coin you really are just guessing."
So then do you feel that a woman who has been raped/assaulted is not in a potentially more emotionally fragile state than a man accused of rape/assault? For the record, I would feel the same way even if this was a male/male assault. That's not to saying being falsely accused of something isn't horrible, life-changing and all of that, but since the victim is the one who is here, do you think it might not be a bit more traumatizing to be treated like the conniving female potentially wrecking this man's career, though the doubters do reluctantly admit, he 'may deserve it'?
"She had made up weeks of things I had said to "sexually harass" her. I had been tried and convicted before I had even known I had been accused. I was given the choice of signing a confession and agreement not to do it anymore or walk."
I actually wasn't referencing sexual harassment, which I view as a problem, but a different one. I was referring to sexual assault of the nature to which fonfon was alluding in her posts. Had she posted that her dive instructor had SPOKEN sexually inappropriate, even sexually malicious things to her, I would not feel I was insensitively shoving aside her emotional state.
I'm actually of the belief that a lot of the sexual harassment claims have gone too far anyway, because with speech, it is far easier to slip and say something that offends the wrong person. I'm sure I've done it.
It is harder to miscontrue or let slip physically sexually assaulting an individual, which grows worse by doing so in an environment where the victim must depend on you for his/her life. I don't know the exact nature of the attack, but actually a female DI, using the same power of experience over nonexperience, could attack a male student as well based on that factor.
Now that seems just a teeeensy bit more traumatizing, wouldn't you think? Cooperate or I will take away your power to breathe. Not your freedom; not your reputation, your LIFE. You don't even encounter the on-land assault/rape scenario where getting away from your assailant means you're out of danger. Even escape means you're a noob under 60 feet of ocean.
Forgive me if my sensitivies, given the circumstances, go to the victim? I am intrinsically suspicious of sexual harassment suits for the same reason you named. I am also of the opinion that a lot of people really need to lighten up about what constitutes offensiveness.
"I personally believe that something happened, but I know that someone else's life, carreer and reputation is being slung through the mud, and no one is being allowed to question anything."
Seems like things are being questioned. And it's nice that you believe something happened; it seems like many are almost assuming a hostility towards the victim coupled with 'evil female' scenarios. It's hard to see someone coming for support and seeing this come out of it, particularly in a case so sensitive.
Besides, if we are to believe his note, business is booming! (irony intended)