Separate Tech Section -- good idea???

[large_diver]

Looks like my idea has been squashed by a resounding 14-3 vote ;-)

Thanks for all the constructive responses!

 

[syruss32]

Originally posted by detroit diver
I think this is one of the few (if not the only) place on the 'net that a newbie could come and ask questions without getting slammed. I havent met anyone on this board who wouldnt take the time and answer what might be considered a "dumb" question.

I think you were being tongue in cheek, but thought I'd respond anyway!

Yes I was being "tongue in cheek" though I have seen techies blast newbies on many different sites. I wouldn't think that would happen here as most of the regulars are pretty good people.

 

[Butch103]

Originally posted by roakey
It’s a GREAT idea.


.

Great idea! Says the recreational industry, and proceeds to pervert the idea into the HUB (my favorite whipping boy for how to do something completely wrong). Guess the industry isn’t interested in the concept of “reducing failure points” and “simplicity” yet.


Roak

Roakey........what problems do you find with the HUB system ?? They look interesting to me (couldn't afford one ). Do you think they configuration is wrong or ........??????

Thanks

Butch eace:

 

[WetDane]

Hey I like it -
Good place - look forward to participating...

And Butch... You sure know how to get yourself a new one...
Good luck...

Big T

 

[algulfdiver]

than Wreck or other post having there own? I do think there should be more talk about what diving is being done along with who's stuff is the best. Just MY 2cents

 

[blacknet]

Hello,

Naturaly it's a bad idea. Reasoning is somewhat simple. Name ONE 'tech diver' list that's friendly, honest, open, non-hostile, non-bashing, non-bs and non-DIR.

Facts states it can't be done.

Ed

 

[detroit diver]

Quest.

 

[blacknet]

Hello,

Uhm, sure keep dreaming.

Ed

 

[detroit diver]

Okay, remove the non-hostile, non-bashing part!!

 

[roakey]

Originally posted by Butch103
Roakey........what problems do you find with the HUB system ?? They look interesting to me (couldn't afford one ). Do you think they configuration is wrong or ........??????

I must have missed this post!

Ignoring the introduction of many, many failure points, hard to rinse, hard to inspect & maintain, complex, not upgradeable, the octo is hidden away which discourages testing and its awfully expensive, it's perfect.

Roak