Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I don't like the Kubi system, and my understanding is the ovals are the most comfortable option, but I'm happy to be proven wrong by someone who understands this better than I
It is not the sitec ovals...they are not a dry glove system....they are a wrist seal retention system that is also used as a platform for mating a dryglove ring system.The actual Sitec ovals are the worst dry gloves I have ever had. 0/10 would never recommend. I switched to the roclocs
Yes the actual glove side rings are the Antares which are designed to mate with the QCS system.It is not the sitec ovals...they are not a dry glove system....they are a wrist seal retention system that is also used as a platform for mating a dryglove ring system.
What you are actually referring to. Is the sitec Antares dryglove ring system which was designed to integrate with the qcs oval wrist ring system.
It is agreed by most that the Antares is a horrible dryglove system.
-Z
Just scratch those off, they are stupid and have a miserable leak to success ratioSi-Tech Antares
Si-Tech Virgo
Waterproof Ultima DGS
4th Element Ellipse
Rolock 90
The dryglove ring systems listed above are not cross-compatible with the 60910 (QCP) ring system.