I'm sorry, Angelo. I can't let this one go.
You just disproved your own statement with your parenthetical addition. There's nothing more fault tolerant than a downstream second stage. It doesn't fail shut. If your first stage has a high IP failure, your second is still breathable. Yet, you chose complexity for the improved performance of the BA.
Why do you think that converting a plain 109 to a BA increases complexity?
The number of parts remains the same. The BA poppet originally was in two parts, then in three parts, but the latest S-wing poppet is one piece...
And the balance chamber is placed where in the original one there was a low-friction plastic distancer.
The modification does not just make the reg slightly smoother, it also increases fault tolerance (as some IP fluctuations from 1st stage are compensated for) and the seat is lasting longer thanks to the smaller static load, due to the lighter spring.
So modifying the 109 makes it more fault tolerant and reliable, keeping the number of parts unchanged.
For years I did employ the BA mod on my primary, while leaving the secondary unmodified.
In the years I did see those secondaries having more problems and often having small hissing, while the BA-modified primary was always flawless.
As soon ad the single piece S-wing poppet was made available, I did modify also all my secondary ones, and since then I had no more hissing, even if jumping over the standard service intervals...