Looks like we are making progress. I agree, one category should be Freshwater/Caves/Ceontes (sp?). So let's find 4-5 more everyone agrees on. Once we have those maybe people could pick one or two of their pictures that are not their best and would represent the "minimum quality" we are looking for. Once again I believe the more people who are involved the eaiser it will be to cover costs.
I have attached a shot that I feel that is way below what we are looking for. Would need to be much better lit and have to be taken from much closer.
I am off tomorrow for Shanghai, returning th 23rd. I will try to firm up some more of the costs and find out what format the printer want everything in. Still need someone to look into Quark programs.
I have attached a shot that I feel that is way below what we are looking for. Would need to be much better lit and have to be taken from much closer.
I am off tomorrow for Shanghai, returning th 23rd. I will try to firm up some more of the costs and find out what format the printer want everything in. Still need someone to look into Quark programs.