Is that a standard unit or just made up ?As in surface liters, yes. PV = nRT.
Does it have an abbreviation?
Why can’t we use surface cu.ft. ?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Is that a standard unit or just made up ?As in surface liters, yes. PV = nRT.
By giving units (e.g., miles per gallon, km per liter) no one is confused.
I don't measure my gas consumption in volume per time. I measure my gas consumption in surface volume per time.
No, we usually use L/100km. Basically the inverse of your mpg. Units notwithstanding.European mpg convention in metric is a little weird. They use km/100L.
Can't you? I'd love if you did, but most of y'all seem to me to insist on using cu.ft/min, pressure be damned.Why can’t we use surface cu.ft. ?
I think you must have mistaken me with someone else though, because I am French so if I used anything else than litres for volume it was just to continue someone’s else discussion.Can't you? I'd love if you did, but most of y'all seem to me to insist on using cu.ft/min, pressure be damned.
most of y'all. This board is rather heavily US-centric.I think you must have mistaken me with someone else
Actually, most do not do what you say. They start with psi/min at depth, convert that to surface cuft/min. They just don't call it surface cuft.Can't you? I'd love if you did, but most of y'all seem to me to insist on using cu.ft/min, pressure be damned.
Which makes for a non-zero amount of confusion. Cite? See upthread.They just don't call it surface cuft
No, we usually use L/100km. Basically the inverse of your mpg. Units notwithstanding.