Well, the course title cannot "infer" anything, as a course title is not a sentient being so it cannot "deduce or conclude information from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements."
:d
Moreover, the course title is not "Advanced Diver" but rather "Advanced Open Water Diver" so although many people do seem to think that this implies "advanced diver" it comes down to the fact that people just don't read/comprehend well, often inferring something that is not actually stated (or even implied) by the words they read... or use.
I stand corrected.
I suppose that I should clarify; although I am certain that you understood what I meant......
I DO realize that you were joking.......but there's always the word games that seem to get thrown around when this topic comes up.
Not directed specifically at you.
Any reasonable person could conclude that if they were going to sign up for a course that was called Advanced Open Water, that upon completion of such a course, they would possess the skills, or have been adequately taught such skills.....you know.....perhaps something that resembled a skill set that was sort of.....advanced.
As the OP posted....he didn't feel that he was taught much at all. This is similar to what many other people that have taken similar courses experienced.
What happens is, the playing word games, when it comes to this topic: "It's advanced open water......not advanced diver".
The fact is that there are many people that get ****ed by taking substandard courses.....and no shortage of industry "Pros" that defend it with childlike statements.
Meanwhile....so many are baffled why people drop out of diving. Maybe people are tired of being duped and having their wallets picked clean.
But....you're right, Man......it IS called "Advanced Open Water".......we're all retards for thinking that it might contain some actual content that even approached an advanced level of instruction.
OP....it's your fault for not comprehending......welcome to the world of "Pro" dive training.
My bad....for not comprehending that one.

---------- Post added November 26th, 2013 at 02:19 AM ----------
I see no evidence that the OP didn't receive a diligent and thorough course. It is quite possible that all the necessary performance standards were met and yet, the course may still have been unfulfilling.
The certification agency sets out the scope and standards for any given course. The instructor/operation applies those. You cannot criticize the instructor/operation for providing nothing more than the minimum - if that's all you ask for, all that is agree by contract on purchase, then that is what you should be happy to receive. Complaining, especially publicly, about that could easily be determined as slanderous.
There are instructors/operators who routinely provide far beyond the bare minimum. They are obviously who you should look for.
Very true.
---------- Post added November 26th, 2013 at 02:39 AM ----------
Apologies if I came across as heated in that post.
I just get tired of hearing newer divers (not that the OP is really that new)....describing feeling of getting short changed.
I love diving!...I really do.
But I sometimes get the feeling that the "industry" is just there to pick people clean.
That divers are seen simply as a means to feed the machine. I really feel that some people drop out of diving because they are made to feel that way; often, after taking these types of courses.
The fact is that the OP had an
expectation of getting training that was "advanced" (in some way, ok?).
I don't care about any damn word games. He didn't feel he received that type of training.
Advanced Open Water is marketed as a damn "advanced" class. He feels strongly enough about it, that he started a thread about it.
It's simple, and all too common; He doesn't feel like he got his $400 worth. It doesn't sound to me like he did either.
Somebody please explain to me why a diver can't walk into a "5 Star" resort and sign up for a class, and feel that he got his money's worth?
Why do we so frequently hear about divers feeling the exact opposite of that?
And when they mention it on a forum.....the response is usually along the lines of...you should have interviewed the instructor first. Or, "That's what you get for not having the N.S.A. do a background check on the instructor."
Really?.......what's wrong with a diver (a customer), having an expectation of service and substance?
We all have a concept of what "5 Star" service is supposed to mean, don't we?
Or is that another assumption.....or reading comprehension fail....if I conclude on my own that "5 Star" is supposed to mean something other than what I "think" it means.
Note: I should add that I realize the OP may not have actually taken his training at a "5 Star" resort. It came to mind while considering how things have words attached to them to indicate (or make the customer think so) the level those things are at.
Not to go off on a tangent; before someone jumps all over that one. Haha!
If someone goes on vacation and experiences bad service with a resort, restaurant, boat operation, retail store, etc. it's ok. People are happy to hear reports about it, and
might factor that into their future trip plans.
Buy if
anyone says
anything bad about a "training" experience; that forbidden!
Oh noooo!!! Training is
that thing which shall not be spoken negatively about. haha!
The fact is, many divers have felt the same as the OP after taking some courses out there.
OP...sorry you left with that feeling about your course.
It really sucks, Man!
Cheers,
Mitch