aaen
Contributor
Hmm, could you not just go and get a prescription from the doc, saying that you are required to wear gloves due to some sort of skin condition or something like that?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
cowboyneal:Screw the "rules." I wear gloves every time, or no tips...guess what? I always get to wear them (wink, wink, nod, nod, just put them on while descending please). It's exposure protection, not "so I can touch things" protection. It's also against the law to smoke pot, walk across the street against a red light and a whole bunch of other things I'm sure all these "regulation followers" on here must do every day. Like I said, tell the people that no gloves=no tips, and watch the rules disappear...and yes, "mental buffoons" would cover the issue well, because as I say, gloves never hurt a reef: bad diving does. What's next, no wet suits? Fins (as was astutely noted) cause more damage than gloves and those aren't banned (sticky little issue there because without fins, there would be no diving and therefore no big American, Japanese and European bucks, yens or euros in ye old island economies or pockets of the dive oeprations which would then be, well, non-existent) so it's all some kind of lip service that's ridiculous, and, as I said, I'm sure all of the 'righteous' regulation followers also believe Sadaam had WMD, stand on empty corners staring at empty streets at 4am waiting for traffic lights to turn green and more than likely take on the appearance of sheep rather than human beings....
cowboyneal:ba-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a...Methinks that wearing dive gloves doesn't quite rise to the level of committing murder, stealing or poaching - your analogy fails utterly and completely. ...
Turtle Diver:jaybombs25:Ana:None of these actions are against the law and opposite to popular opinion do not have a negative effect on the health of the planet.
Thanks for the warning. I won't be visiting St Lucia.
Maybe they'll ban Diving. Gloves, suits, fins, etc. can't damage anything without the diver. Then they can sit on the surface remarking how nice the depths probably are.
irishsquid:Turtle Diver:jaybombs25:Maybe they'll ban Diving. Gloves, suits, fins, etc. can't damage anything without the diver. Then they can sit on the surface remarking how nice the depths probably are.
They wont ban diving.That would hurt their economy.
ianr33:irishsquid:Turtle Diver:They wont ban diving.That would hurt their economy.
You're right, of course. Banning gloves is a band-aid approach. As others have posted, p*** poor skill causes damage; but sorry divers also contribute to the economy. A competent diver, whether gloved or not, will leave bubbles. A cruddy diver will likely use their fins instead of bare hands to prevent touching the bottom. IMO