GShockey
Contributor
Wow, I had no idea I had been bent that much...
Lamont, don't worry, I'm sure we can find some tables that show you that you weren't bent.....;-)
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Wow, I had no idea I had been bent that much...
Any video or pictures from these perfect dives? Screen shots of profiles? We're listening... I'm sure liteheaded and others would love to hear more about mixed gas topics you have no formal training in and no experience with either (again) - yet for some curious reason demand scientific "proof" of the validity of everyone else's experiences.
I think that our conversation with Richard is not so much oriented to deep air vs helium, but more about ratio deco and how it is validated. I have not demanded much scientific proof about much in this thread. But in a recent thread I did demand the scientific proof. The intent of my demanding scientific proof is not to debunk it. It is an effort for an accurate characterization of the methodology. I do not believe that it is accurate to say that the three pillars of ratio deco are dissolved gases, bubble mechanics, and deep stops. IMHO there has not been any research work directed at studying ratio deco and dissolved gases or ratio deco and bubble mechanics. I'm still not sure why deep stops has a "pillar" status. And as I said before, the fact that there is no research work does not negate the fact that for some people it works very well.helium is just the bees knees you guys. all the cool kids are doing it.
I would imagine it's along the lines of 'we aren't getting bent...
...too much'
again, very similar to what we're doing