OP
- Messages
- 5,721
- Reaction score
- 474
Here is the link for the full document :
http://www.dhmjournal.com/files/Fock-Rebreather_deaths.pdf
Does this link open for you?
Cheers,
DocV
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Here is the link for the full document :
http://www.dhmjournal.com/files/Fock-Rebreather_deaths.pdf
It just worked for me.
(my emphasis)METHODS: Rebreather fatalities between 1998 and 2010 were extracted from the Deeplife rebreather mortality database
Thank you !!!!!.....Rebreathers are no more or less 'dangerous' than singles, doubles, mixed gas or cave diving etc....Proper training, maturity and a heavy dose of common sense !!!!!.......If you read the entire article that was release about a month ago, and you have even the slightest brain power, you can draw your own conclusions about the "scientific" approach of this article. Do a search on any of the technical forums and the consensus is that this report is a joke with so much bs in the data collection and so much first person "experience" by the writer that we pretty much discount the entire article. The writer actually makes comments like, "In my experience" blah blah blah. At any rate, if you've ever taken a course on statistical analysis or ever written any kind of research paper, you'll quickly catch that this was a poorly written piece of junk.
Well, all I can say is that it's a very good thing the major scuba agencies aren't fast-tracking inexperienced instructors to teach rec CCR and marketing those courses to the masses...
Phew... that'd be terrible..