dumpsterDiver
Banned
- Messages
- 9,003
- Reaction score
- 4,658
- # of dives
- 2500 - 4999
The arguement made for 1.6 exposure at 130 (with 32%) was that there was a problem with the oxygen clock for 3 repet dives.. Thall.. shows that the no-deco limits will be the governing constraint.
However, if someone were to use a "rich mix" at a shallower depth (say using 40% at 100 ft) it would be closer to getting the diver into oxygen trouble rather than deco, especially if the SI were an hour or so.. yes?
However, if someone were to use a "rich mix" at a shallower depth (say using 40% at 100 ft) it would be closer to getting the diver into oxygen trouble rather than deco, especially if the SI were an hour or so.. yes?