mongoose
Contributor
jonnythan:There are a bunch of threads of this.. basically, AFAIK, it's never been used that way on humans. The two problems I keep hearing are getting rid of CO2 fast enough and it's an incredible amount of work to breathe.
They *do* use the partially-flooded lung trick to treat certain respiratory diseases though.. but it's only for a short time and I don't think they fully flood the lungs with the liquid.
The idea is true and exists.. the movie just took the current technology and "enhanced" it a bit.. but to their credit, they (as they did with a lot of other things in the movie) didn't completely replace it with what they thought it *could* be. They made it obvious that it was difficult to breathe and couldn't do a lot of work with it.
What was great was when they locked the helmet down on Ed Harris and they held on to him for the "panic phase". IIRC, he only spazzed for a moment. I would imagine that the reaction would be substantially more violent...
Or would it? If you were getting oxygen, or more accurately, if you were offloading CO2, your body wouldn't think it was starving... but you would still have to overcome the primal fear of having your lungs fill with fluid.
As far as breathing effort, I wonder if some sort of pump could be set up, perhaps a two-way demand reg, but with fluid. As you breathe in, a pump gently flows fluid in.. as you breathe out, it gently pulls it out.
All sci-fi, of course, just ruminating.
--'Goose