- Messages
- 5,884
- Reaction score
- 2,999
- Location
- Lake Worth, Florida, United States
- # of dives
- I'm a Fish!
That's where things could get dicey. A diver surfaces and quickly realizes that he is losing buoyancy. Reaching into a pocket or up under the plate for a buoyancy tool probably has not ever been practiced by the diver. If tired or if the seas are rough, or both, that might end badly. The diver in the GUE-F class had a bag, but never thought to deploy it as he called out, "A little help.... gurgle!"
Likewise, a second inflator could present the same issues if not practiced. However, most divers would much rather have a working BC rather than be hanging onto a bag in heavy seas. Fortunately, wing failures are rare and rarer still are wing failures with total loss of buoyancy.
On a side note, instructors need to be careful about teaching drysuits as buoyancy devices from a legal perspective without checking to see if the drysuit manufacturer intends for the suit to be used as part of the buoyancy system. If a drysuit manufacturer states clearly that the suit is not intended as a buoyancy device, then that could open up a can of worms. That's actually the reason why some agencies state that a dual wing is required in their standards - so that instructors don't open that window of liability in which they advocate that a device be used in a way that wasn't intended. The same goes for liftbags and DSMB's.
And again, to me it is irresponsible for an Agency to put baby tech divers in heavy steels that WILL mean they will be dangerously negative if a wing problem occurs. Much smarter would be to mandate a balanced rig( meaning you don't need the wing to swim it up)...then, someday, when they have loads of experience, they can re-think dragging much more gas with them. I still don't get why a tech diver in ocean needs more than 25 minutes at 280---meaning why they can't get by with Al80's rather than big heavy steels. If the breathing rate is too high to get close to 25 minutes of BT, then probably the diver needs 100 more dives to work on slickness and efficiency and low heart rate, before they should be doing the deep dives. Also, after 20 or 30 deep dives with the balanced rig, the new tech diver will probably figure out this is a much smarter way to go, and the problem goes away with the heavy cr*p.
Of course, the balanced rig mandate would cost dive shops selling TECH, loads of income, because the steels are 2 and three times as expensive at aluminum 80's, and with the full gas loads, they get to sell a 4th regulator. The same shops would be horrified to hear that divers don't need to throw away the money on the dual bladder wings, and that would mean that if they want to try and eek out big money from tech, they would have to shift to selling Closed Circuit Rebreathers

***Note--this is not PADI Bashing, per se. While I was certified NAUI in 72, and mentored by GI of WKPP for tech, and taken Fundies by GUE.... I recently did the PADI DM course because I needed it for a program we have for getting non-divers an underwater Experience--and then from the PADI DM, I got an Instructor rating for the Tooka through NASE.... I will say that the PADI Rescue and DM classes were top notch, and I think the agency did a great job with the material and required skills for these classes. However, when they moved into the tech arena, they kept the PADI OW1 mindset of trying to make the classes fit the largest number of divers--to open this up to as much income as possible. That is NOT the right way to go for tech diving, or cave diving.