rescuediver009:
I would think that this is because of the really high flow rate that is higher than the recovery rate of the reg...
That is the logical conclusion but I wondered how much was too much and if a current configuration BA was excessive compared to other second stages it would have been paired with. So I did some more testing of the Mk 5 with a variety of other older second stages that it would have potentially been paired with during it's career including:
Scubapro High Performance (080)
Scubapro Air 1
Scubapro D300
Scubapro D400
(I'd have loved to try a Pilot second stage, but I don't own one.)
I also tested some other second stages of the same general vintage:
US Divers Aquarius
US Divers Conshelf XII
Sherwood second stage
As well as a couple others I just had laying around:
Dacor Viper Octo
Dacor Pacer Aero
During a full sustained depression of the purge button most of them showed a pressure drop from the normal IP of 142 to 110 with the High Performance dropping to 115 psi and the D300 and D400 dropping to 105 psi.
The Dacor regs stood out as the Viper only showed a pressure drop to 125 psi and had noticeably less airflow. (not my first choice for a second stage as it is apparently a real dog compared to everything else made in the last 30 years)
However the relatively inexpensive late 80's vintage Pacer Aero showed a drop to 105 psi for the first second or so then fell sharply to 90 psi. It apparently has some interesting venturi effects occurring that really open up the valve once things get cooking.
But depending on the Scubapro second stage attached, an IP drop of 30-40 psi was encountered with the Mk 5 and I would consequently conclude that this was pretty normal for the Mk 5. All tests were done at a supply pressure of 1000 psi.
SP used to publish a variety of test data in their catalogs and I remember comparing the specs of the Mk 5 and Mk 10 when I bought my first reg in 1983. I recall the Mk 10 having fairly even flow rates at high and low pressures with 110 SCFM at 3000 psi and 90 SCFM at 500 psi while the Mk 5 fell from 105 SCFM at 3000 psi to 64 SCFM at 500 psi.
The Mk 5 had a stellar reputation as a high performance workhorse at the time (and still does) and the Mk 10 was relatively new and still not fully trusted. But the MK 10 had much better performance at lower tank pressures. It was enough to sell me on the Mk 10.