WeRtheOcean
Contributor
- Messages
- 394
- Reaction score
- 225
- # of dives
- None - Not Certified
I was a sonar operator in the Navy. I can tell you that sonar is not an exact science. Even our fathometer could give fluctuating readings over what seemed impossibly short distances for such big changes in bottom topography. And there was also the deep scattering layer to beware of.
Sound beams face the same limitations. Under some sea conditions, our sonar data wasn't worth a crap. Seasonal changes could make the same sea "clear as mud" that was at other times excellent "visibility."
The disto won't work in very high humidity "misty" conditions, there's too much scattering of the light beam. Same issue happens underwater, its not possible to use lasers due to refraction, diffusion, and beam scatter.
Sound beams face the same limitations. Under some sea conditions, our sonar data wasn't worth a crap. Seasonal changes could make the same sea "clear as mud" that was at other times excellent "visibility."