GrumpyOldGuy
Contributor
Damn. I'm still such a geek. No wonder I didn't go to my high school prom...
Sorry, Grumpy..!
![]()
Sorry for what... it is just a redundant answering system
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Damn. I'm still such a geek. No wonder I didn't go to my high school prom...
Sorry, Grumpy..!
![]()
Yeah, high fives all round. Never mind that neither of you addressed the question that I was actually asking...

Yeah, high fives all round. Never mind that neither of you addressed the question that I was actually asking...
Sorry for what... it is just a redundant answering systemused to reduce the odds of bad information being passed on by 2:1

Can we see a photo of this setup please?
First stage regulator failures that result in immediate loss of air are EXTREMELY rare, to the point where a heart attack, lightning strike, or shark attack is probably as or more likely. Do you carry a defibrillator and a bang stick with you too? Of course not.
No. You obviously have a different take on this issue from mine, so this will be my final post on it. But, my point was that 1st stage failure is POSSIBLE. ANY equipment failure is possible. In my training over many decades as a pilot, I learned that redundancy was the proven solution to equipment failures, which could and would occur.
I could care less about probability theory on it - it's POSSIBLE. That's the point. A viable solution is an RAS, i.e., a pony. That's all. You can make all the counter-arguments on it that you want to, but the facts remain.
What the experience level of the diver is has little to nothing to do with the reality that an RAS gives the diver a new place to go, if his "old" place goes tango uniform.