Charlie99
Contributor
- Messages
- 7,966
- Reaction score
- 169
- # of dives
- 500 - 999
A few million bazillion cubic feet of air at 1atm. Just 40' away.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Now where in the world did you get that? An "H" valve has fewer failure points and greater reliability than manifolded doubles and provides two completely independent gas delivery paths.Amphibious:an H-valve isn't redundancy.
drbill:If I am diving solo to 130 ft or so I dive a 19 cu ft pony bottle attached to my primary tank.
By that standard, manifolded doubles are also still a SINGLE gas source. All it would take is for an isolator o-ring to go and you're hooped. And before someone cries "oh that will never happen" I saw one go on a friend's rig just before he was going to put it on to dive it.Amphibious:still a SINGLE gas source.
all it would take is a burst disk to go and you're hooped.
and before someone cries "oh that will never happen", one went one my back just as I rolled off a boat. it;s loud, it's no fun, and I couldn't hear anything for quite some time.
Rick Murchison:By that standard, manifolded doubles are also still a SINGLE gas source. All it would take is for an isolator o-ring to go and you're hooped. And before someone cries "oh that will never happen" I saw one go on a friend's rig just before he was going to put it on to dive it.
So if we accept that standard (there exists a single point where a failure - no matter how remote the chance - can drain all your gas) only independent tanks satisfy "redundancy." But then you can't get to all the gas if you have a single reg failure. I guess we're just hooped no matter what.
For me... an "H" valve satisfies redundancy as well or better than manifolded doubles. The only reason I use doubles is because the dive plan calls for the additional gas.
Rick
RockPile:If, and only if, you use the stage bottle for extending bottom time it offers no redundancy. That's your choice. Not a mandatory or "correct" configuration (nor is mine for that matter).
JimC:IMHO, If your going to solo dive you require a completely separate system with enough gas to bailout. Manifolded doubles and H-Vavles don't cut it. They are great tools when you have a buddy around but provide to many ways to have a single failure bite you.
Nothing provides 100% redundancy (your "redundant" second bottle could quietly leak by a tank neck o-ring unnoticed while you're swimming along captivated by other things, or by way of an unnoticed freeflow if you just forgot to turn it off). There are simply "acceptable levels" of redundancy. I accept the level of manifolded doubles, "H" valves, ponies, independent doubles...Soggy:I would choose to dive independent doubles since they provide 100% redundancy. They don't work so well in a team environment, but for solo, I think they make the most sense.