LeadTurn_SD
Contributor
1. Is 5 minutes at depth a reasonable precaution or excessively conservative?
2. Is an assent rate of 30'/minute likely to be followed by someone who's main air supply just failed? For that matter, is it even wise? Would it be better to ascend at 60'/min in case the backup air supply failed too?
There is nothing wrong with "padding" your estimated gas requirements by increasing the problem-solving time at max depth. But I think most folks use 1 or 2 minutes "at depth" in their estimates.
Use a "normal" ascent rate (30' min) in your calculations, including safety stop. But in "real life", you'll do what you need to do in order to get to the surface safely.
You can only plan and prepare for a finite number of "failures" on one dive. Redundancy can be taken to such an extreme that we'd never dive at all.... and honestly, for the conditions I dive in (warm, clear, near-zero entanglement risk) I don't carry a pony unless deeper than 60'.
Best wishes.