glbirch
Contributor
Hacker style? Please. Don't get me started...RIDIVER501:
PMs CENSORED ?
- Thread starter cdiver2
- Start date
Please register or login
The Kraken
He Who Glows in the Dark Waters (ADVISOR)
ScubaBoard Supporter
Scuba Instructor
Divemaster
OK, here goes my troll.
Why does a reasonably civilized and intelligent person need to communicate in language that requires censoring?
Why does a reasonably civilized and intelligent person need to communicate in language that requires censoring?
glbirch
Contributor
Rhetorical! 2 point penalty.The Kracken:
The Kraken
He Who Glows in the Dark Waters (ADVISOR)
ScubaBoard Supporter
Scuba Instructor
Divemaster
Oooh !!!
I am SO ashamed !!!
I am SO ashamed !!!
RIDIVER501
Contributor
Not trying to get you started, just saying with computers there is a way around everything
Windwalker
Contributor
RIDIVER501:
I like the way you think. Now if I can just get my computer to clean my room and make me dinner, I would be set.
glbirch
Contributor
It was the "hacker style" part that I was referring to.RIDIVER501:
- Messages
- 3,669
- Reaction score
- 3
I think it's called geek chic....glbirch:
It looks like most of the major points were brought up and Natasha certainly gave a good explination of how our software works. One other small point to keep in mind is that with over 625,000 posts and nearly 2,000,000 content pages (yes, Ive counted) Scuba Board posts appear all over google and other search engines. Only a few of our forums have restrictions to guest viewing which means that while you may think about a conversation as being for "adults only" it is very likely that a child surfing around could find it as well. One of NetDoc's goals has been to keep this forum family friendly so parents dont have to stop their children from viewing our site and parental censors don't block it out, this means we censor the public post and as a related function, the PMs, we can't modify one side without modifying the other and in a forum this big there is abuse, there are problems and the censor function does serve it's intended purpose very well, most of the time. Of course technology isn't perfect...
