I think you did very well overall and certainly did right giving him your known good air source first.
That I am also saying that, because it is not described whether you saw him check and test breathe his pony during or before final buddy check. And with the benefit of armchair quaterbacking that I am wondering about. Did you know his pony tank was good and full with a working reg? Being the buddy, he also was your "safety" mechanism so to speak. Did you know (before splashing - did you ask? verify?) if he was diving his pony with the valve open for faster access or with the valve closed for a more assured air supply on case...?
About going deeper than planned. Well if you had a contingency for it and Identified at what pressure you need to depart that depth for a normal safe ascend with enough gas in your tank for you and your buddy for the entire ascend (for in case something ovcurred right at the lowest point, just prior to ascend, then it's all good. If not, then heed what a prior poster wrote. Not critiquing really, more thinking that I need to get that thinking more engrained into myself. It's just so easy to go look first... and then think... (and I am not saying that's what you did).
Did you do the right thing ascending to SS first and then checking his pony (by having him use it or did you check (blow some bubbles out of reg) first?) ? I think you did right by minimizing time at depth to conserve gas and by checking how much gas is being used and how that looks in the big picture of getting to the surface.
Hypothetically, assume you had checked (you may have) his pony's SPG tight down there as the incident occurred. Assume it was empty. Assume all that was left was your own remaining gas supply. Would you have changed anything prior to the SS?
You may have had to cut the SS short, but I am wondering what you or others might have chosen to do under that assumption (purely a what if assumption, should never happen, but, what if...). Would any of you change anything prior to the SS? Maybe speed up the ascend in the low half of the column (e.g. to double speed, which makes it the same proportional pressure change per time unit as ascending regular speed in the upper half of the column) to further minimize gas use and maximise time available to slow down where it matters most?
I am curious about general opinions on the latter, but I am also asking because (unless you were sure there was a full pony there, but hey, that reg could fail), if you think you would have changed something, well that would be good for thought.
The whole description and discussion is great food for thought. Certainly glad it went so well. Thanks to @dewdropsonrosa you really. Somebody ows you beer or some other poison of choice for life (or less if you're generous...) I sure hope that person choses to not be defensive in his coping mechanism and mulls this over hard and learns !
That I am also saying that, because it is not described whether you saw him check and test breathe his pony during or before final buddy check. And with the benefit of armchair quaterbacking that I am wondering about. Did you know his pony tank was good and full with a working reg? Being the buddy, he also was your "safety" mechanism so to speak. Did you know (before splashing - did you ask? verify?) if he was diving his pony with the valve open for faster access or with the valve closed for a more assured air supply on case...?
About going deeper than planned. Well if you had a contingency for it and Identified at what pressure you need to depart that depth for a normal safe ascend with enough gas in your tank for you and your buddy for the entire ascend (for in case something ovcurred right at the lowest point, just prior to ascend, then it's all good. If not, then heed what a prior poster wrote. Not critiquing really, more thinking that I need to get that thinking more engrained into myself. It's just so easy to go look first... and then think... (and I am not saying that's what you did).
Did you do the right thing ascending to SS first and then checking his pony (by having him use it or did you check (blow some bubbles out of reg) first?) ? I think you did right by minimizing time at depth to conserve gas and by checking how much gas is being used and how that looks in the big picture of getting to the surface.
Hypothetically, assume you had checked (you may have) his pony's SPG tight down there as the incident occurred. Assume it was empty. Assume all that was left was your own remaining gas supply. Would you have changed anything prior to the SS?
You may have had to cut the SS short, but I am wondering what you or others might have chosen to do under that assumption (purely a what if assumption, should never happen, but, what if...). Would any of you change anything prior to the SS? Maybe speed up the ascend in the low half of the column (e.g. to double speed, which makes it the same proportional pressure change per time unit as ascending regular speed in the upper half of the column) to further minimize gas use and maximise time available to slow down where it matters most?
I am curious about general opinions on the latter, but I am also asking because (unless you were sure there was a full pony there, but hey, that reg could fail), if you think you would have changed something, well that would be good for thought.
The whole description and discussion is great food for thought. Certainly glad it went so well. Thanks to @dewdropsonrosa you really. Somebody ows you beer or some other poison of choice for life (or less if you're generous...) I sure hope that person choses to not be defensive in his coping mechanism and mulls this over hard and learns !
Last edited: