chrisch
Contributor
....
As a practical matter, the big question that I have long pondered--well, at least in the four years since I began heading down the GUE path--is what level of performance does one truly need as a prerequisite for safe deco or cave training? I know there are some experienced tech divers on SB who would say that GUE's threshold is NOT higher than necessary but rather about right. TDI doesn't seem to have a well-defined threshold but rather leaves it up to the individual instructors, some of whom seem happy to teach deco procedures to people who cannot hold a 20 foot stop while switching to a deco tank, which is a bit disconcerting to me.
For me the issue with GUE is about attitude not skill levels per se. Your example of teaching deco to someone who cannot hold a stop is a good example. The GUE path requires the core skills to be there before advancement. For sure this is available with other agencies and GUE is not the only route. However, I have yet to meet anyone in GUE that would countenance the idea of letting someone push past their limits. In addition I like the "team" based philosophy of the GUE approach.
Fundies is expensive, both in money and time and commitment. It is on my "to do" list but I have insufficient of all three right now. When I was younger and new to diving I would have benefited from Fundies and had the time and commitment and I guess could have found the money if I really tried. If the OP can, then why not? I doubt anyone would see it as a bad investment over time. It is only a dumb thing to do if (like so very many people) you stop diving after a few years for some reason.
IMHO the GUE threshold is correct for overhead environment and caves specifically. You can get there other routes without doubt.