Well, I hope so anyway. I am still an instructor at the local college in the paramedic program. This weekend, as is every superbowl weekend is the culmination of the ITLS training (International Trauma Life Support) where the paramedic students take their written and practical exams. We run lots of trauma scenarios for practice prior to the final testing to see how the students put their training to use by following the established protocols. It also lets us know what the students have retained from all of their lectures and clinical experiences. The paramedic program is 1 full year long for the certificate program and 2 years for the associates degree and will end this June.
Anyway, when we run the students through assessment practice stations, we usually make up scenarios for them. This morning, on the last day of practice before the final practical one of the scenarios that I gave was the following:
*You are dispatched to a local quarry for a scuba diving incident. As they make inquiries about the situation during their initial scene size up, it was disclosed to them the the unconscious diver who was pulled to shore was witnessed accidentally dislodging his weightbelt from a depth of 80' and encountered an uncontrolled ascent. The patient was found floating at the surface and pulled to shore.
The condition of the patient is as follows:
Unconscious, unresponsive to verbal or painful stimuli, airway compromised with pink, frothy sputum, respiratory effort of 40 after clearing the airway with suctioning. Some of the physical exam findings were: +JVD, Slightly deviated trachea to the R, Sub Q air at the left clavical area, diminished breath sounds on the L with no other outward signs of trauma.
What amazed me is that the students were pretty much clueless with this one since they did not fully understand barotrauma. Of course they recognized a probable tension pneumo but were thrown off by the pink frothy sputum and sub-Q air. When we asked what they think happened, they for some reason were trying to establish some sort of a blunt trauma incident which we were very clear was not part of the incident.
I suppose my purpose in posting is to recognize that there is very little of the trauma portion of the class dedicated to diving accidents and I am going to sit down with the head of the department to see if we could add more of this to the program.
Does anyone else spend much time in this area?
Anyway, when we run the students through assessment practice stations, we usually make up scenarios for them. This morning, on the last day of practice before the final practical one of the scenarios that I gave was the following:
*You are dispatched to a local quarry for a scuba diving incident. As they make inquiries about the situation during their initial scene size up, it was disclosed to them the the unconscious diver who was pulled to shore was witnessed accidentally dislodging his weightbelt from a depth of 80' and encountered an uncontrolled ascent. The patient was found floating at the surface and pulled to shore.
The condition of the patient is as follows:
Unconscious, unresponsive to verbal or painful stimuli, airway compromised with pink, frothy sputum, respiratory effort of 40 after clearing the airway with suctioning. Some of the physical exam findings were: +JVD, Slightly deviated trachea to the R, Sub Q air at the left clavical area, diminished breath sounds on the L with no other outward signs of trauma.
What amazed me is that the students were pretty much clueless with this one since they did not fully understand barotrauma. Of course they recognized a probable tension pneumo but were thrown off by the pink frothy sputum and sub-Q air. When we asked what they think happened, they for some reason were trying to establish some sort of a blunt trauma incident which we were very clear was not part of the incident.
I suppose my purpose in posting is to recognize that there is very little of the trauma portion of the class dedicated to diving accidents and I am going to sit down with the head of the department to see if we could add more of this to the program.
Does anyone else spend much time in this area?