MaxE
Contributor
I will agree that it was not in line with normal moderation. Regardless, everyone was warned and as at October 18th, things were good in the thread. Then by no fault of his own, another member reading from more than a month ago responded with a post that stirred up old info. We shouldn't have to keep remoderating for the same issue month after month, year after year. The mod post from Oct 18, tells the story.
From there, you should be able to ascertain what happened even if you can't see the posts that were deleted.
And no warning? With respect, how many warnings should posters need?
And this thread, who is moderating it?