Everything you mentioned (excluding on site gas analysis) should be a part of any dive regardless of the gas used. That's basic OW stuff. How is nitrox any different? As for on site analysis, I've never seen anyone check their gas on the boat. It's checked and labeled at the store, and you and the filler sign off on it. There's nothing done underwater that's NEEDS to be observed for a nitrox class unless you're lacking skills that should have been learned in basic OW -- in which case you shouldn't have gotten this far anyway.
Look, I'm not at all against high standards, but the current system of certifications seems to be hypocritcal. The standards are so low for the PADI type classes, it's rediculous. If PADI (for example) believes, as it does, that it's students are capable divers, then why the dives for nitrox? The diving itself hasn't changed. If, however, PADI had extremely stringent standards (say on par with GUE) and continued those standards all the way through, then I'd say fine do the dives and weed out the weak divers. I honestly believe they care more about getting them to the next class.
I am certainly not attacking any particular instructors, but rather the industry and current climate. I've seen good instructors who have very high standards and will fail students at any level. Unfortunately, by their own token, the industry standards aren't there. This is blatently evident when I dive on a charter boat and see the mess that inevitably ensues.
Phew! I'm winded now.
Mike
I'm not going to get into a huge debate on all this. The bottom line, in my view, is the swimming itself hasn't changed.