Does anyone know why NOAA chose to use the blends of EAN32 and EAN36 (NOAA I and NOAA II)? I am well aware as to why the recreational community uses the two blends (NOAA had published tables for 32% and 36%), but want I want to know is why were the two blends chosen instead of other mixes such as 31% and 41%?
If you do not know the answer please refrain from typing speculated answers. I do not want to read through multiple blocks of speculated responses based off of guessing or conjecturing. If you know why, enlighten us. This issue has plagued me for quite some time. Everyone I've asked doesn't know the answer. I've come across many people who are happy to provide answers based off of what they think they know, yet they have no clue.
If this post remains answered because no one knows, so be it, so long as the speculatory responses remain absent from this thread. Hopefully someone knows.
If you do not know the answer please refrain from typing speculated answers. I do not want to read through multiple blocks of speculated responses based off of guessing or conjecturing. If you know why, enlighten us. This issue has plagued me for quite some time. Everyone I've asked doesn't know the answer. I've come across many people who are happy to provide answers based off of what they think they know, yet they have no clue.
If this post remains answered because no one knows, so be it, so long as the speculatory responses remain absent from this thread. Hopefully someone knows.