Paladin
Contributor
Back in the summer of 1977, I was involved with the recovery of a boat that had sunk in 130 FFW. I was diving my DA Aqua-Master double hose reg on a steel 72. My dive buddy, Fuzz, and I went down first to find the boat and mark it. It was during that dive, my first ever to that depth, that I got narcked. Big time. I remember following Fuzz down to find the boat and tie a marker to it. It was cold down there and we weren't wearing wetsuits. My teeth were chattering on the rubber mouthpiece and my breathing was becoming erratic. We lucked out and found the boat right away. I was starting to feel light headed and giddy as I watched Fuzz attach the marker and let it go. That was the last I remember. The next thing I knew we were at 90 feet and ascending. Fuzz was holding my mouthpiece in my mouth and hauling me up by my harness strap.
I spent the rest of the time doing support work for the other divers. I have not attempted a dive to that depth since. My personal limit is 100 ft., though even a dive to that depth has been a rarity.
A few days later, I was discussing the incident with the owner/instructor at the dive shop that conducted the recovery and he told me that I was most likely sensitive to narcosis because I was not then (nor am I now) a drinker. He said that divers who habitually drink alcohol are less susceptible to nitrogen narcosis, while non-drinkers, like myself, are influenced more easily and at shallower depths.
It seemed logical to me at the time.
But is there any truth to it? I'm just curious.
I spent the rest of the time doing support work for the other divers. I have not attempted a dive to that depth since. My personal limit is 100 ft., though even a dive to that depth has been a rarity.
A few days later, I was discussing the incident with the owner/instructor at the dive shop that conducted the recovery and he told me that I was most likely sensitive to narcosis because I was not then (nor am I now) a drinker. He said that divers who habitually drink alcohol are less susceptible to nitrogen narcosis, while non-drinkers, like myself, are influenced more easily and at shallower depths.
It seemed logical to me at the time.
But is there any truth to it? I'm just curious.