Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I am using the aqualung DA and the new mistral and i was wondering how the Kraken compares with these.Anyone know or seen any reviews ?
I often wonder if the big heads at Aqualung are paying any attention to any of this?A USD DA, even if converted to the latest components is not in the same league as the Kraken. While a Phoenix equipped DA with the HPR second stage and DBE (duckbill eliminator) is a top notch double hose, still, the Kraken exceeds it. No double hose regulator has ever compared to the Kraken, the exhaust effort is the lowest of any regulator I have tried to measure of any type and it can be tuned to crack at .4 inches. It is one of the few regulators I have found myself de-tuning.
The AL New Mistral lacks an effective Venturi due to poor engineering and apparently a total lack of understanding of (the physics) how to make a good double hose regulator on some engineers part. This is a huge faux pax and that is only the beginning. The hoses are too floaty and the design does not place the diaphragm correctly. It is a kludge of a double hose, a study in how not to do something right. It has no redeeming qualities other than serving as spare parts for the AL Titan LX, as fine a single hose regulator as the New Mistral is a poor double hose regulator.
N
I often wonder if the big heads at Aqualung are paying any attention to any of this?
They are the ones who pretty much ruled the DH market at one time in history, and then they come out with the abortion you mention above.
Now a group of enthusiasts comes up with something that is better than any DH reg in history.
That has to be like getting dog poo thrown in their faces.
I wonder how long it's going to take for the news to hit their board room?
I think you're right.Eric,
Diving is a niche market and I would assume double-hose diving is a much smaller niche so the big guys don't care and are happy to let companies like VDH have the market. Well at least until the market becomes bigger and more lucrative for them. I do not know what was in the collective mind of Aqualung, but I get a strong feeling the "new" mistral (must be about 12 years old now) was an attempt to capture past glory at the lowest possible cost. I also think they were designed for collectors rather than divers. I think AL may have been caught off guard when people actually started to dive them and complained about the lack of performance.