mike_s
Contributor
They said it was in a stones throw of the beach anyway, so you could
just dredge it where it sits and shore dive it.
They apparantly did dredge it up in the 1960's. The Smithsonian Museum
ran the project. The interviewed one of the divers from then who dove
on it. He still lived in Mobile. They showed a few pic's. They apparantly
used suction hose dredges to move the silt. But the silt covered it
back up very quickly.
As for moving it, I'm betting after 150 years underwater that it's
much to fragile to move, even if it was still in good shape in 1960 something.
It also still has the remains of the union soldiers who were in the
ship when it sunk, so best not to disturb it in my opinion.
(but they did recover the Hunley which had remains in it.)
Yep it would be a neat dive if not covered in silt. How often would you
get to dive a Civil War "Ironclad". However, it being covered in silt
does also keep "looters" away from it.
just dredge it where it sits and shore dive it.
They apparantly did dredge it up in the 1960's. The Smithsonian Museum
ran the project. The interviewed one of the divers from then who dove
on it. He still lived in Mobile. They showed a few pic's. They apparantly
used suction hose dredges to move the silt. But the silt covered it
back up very quickly.
As for moving it, I'm betting after 150 years underwater that it's
much to fragile to move, even if it was still in good shape in 1960 something.
It also still has the remains of the union soldiers who were in the
ship when it sunk, so best not to disturb it in my opinion.
(but they did recover the Hunley which had remains in it.)
Yep it would be a neat dive if not covered in silt. How often would you
get to dive a Civil War "Ironclad". However, it being covered in silt
does also keep "looters" away from it.