5615mike:
Mike
Do you consider yourself more at risk of being a buddy....being an educator? Do you believe that you have a higher level of assumed risk or owe higher care even if your not teaching?
IMO you should be able to separate the two but many may disagree.
As someone with a high level of training or experience, you do have a higher duty of care than if diving with your peers.
This is because less experienced divers look up to you as a role model. A role model transfers knowledge by example, therefore even if you are not teaching, you are teaching by default.
A less experienced diver may see you do something and figure out that if you do it, then it must/might be ok for them to do it. If you fail to ensure that they understand that they "should not try this at home" then you are somewhat responsable. Hence the "do not try this at home" warnings on things like MTV´s jackass etc. They are waivers that arose from successful lawsuits, the law must therefore agree that we are more legally responsable than regular divers.
I solve this by going diving for fun where regular divers cant or dont go (beyond the limits of recreational diving).
If I dive at "Boring bay" or "Resort diver reef", I dont care what I am doing, I am someones role model, so therefore working and legally responsable whether being paid or not.
It is sad but true, but legal protection is an important part of risk management.
When trying to make this type of judgment call, I tell people to imagine what the prosecuting lawyer would say, how could they bend your words or use them against you.
Remember, if it wasnt for lawyers, we wouldnt need lawyers.