At the risk of opening a can of worms, I wanted to solicit thoughts on the mk25 evo vs the mk19 evo. Parts of this question have been covered in other threads I've been grateful to read through here, but my question is specifically this:
Given that both are excellent 1st stages, what -if any- are the advantages to the piston/mk25 evo over the mk19 that would swing a decision between the two in favor of the 25?
With the most obvious advantage of the mk19 being that it's environmentally sealed, I'm trying to understand what about the mk25 would tip the balance in its favor.
I'm currently mainly a warm water diver, but plan to keep the reg for the long haul, and could see a situation in which I'd encounter silty or "dirtier" conditions. And if it matters at all, I'd be pairing it with a D420.
I scanned through previous threads trying to find one that addressed this specific point, but couldn't find any. If someone knows of one, please let me know, I definitely don't want to waste anyone's time and rehash something that's been covered before!
Thanks!
Given that both are excellent 1st stages, what -if any- are the advantages to the piston/mk25 evo over the mk19 that would swing a decision between the two in favor of the 25?
With the most obvious advantage of the mk19 being that it's environmentally sealed, I'm trying to understand what about the mk25 would tip the balance in its favor.
I'm currently mainly a warm water diver, but plan to keep the reg for the long haul, and could see a situation in which I'd encounter silty or "dirtier" conditions. And if it matters at all, I'd be pairing it with a D420.
I scanned through previous threads trying to find one that addressed this specific point, but couldn't find any. If someone knows of one, please let me know, I definitely don't want to waste anyone's time and rehash something that's been covered before!
Thanks!