Question MK11 vs MK11 EVO

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Wow 326 grams is insanely light. But, an MK25T Evo is 350 grams. 24 grams doesn't seem like a lot in the larger scheme of things.
True. The compactness and (mostly) sealed aspect of the Mk11T makes it the better choice for me. If only they milled in some grooves in the Titanium versions. If you pull the plastic bottom cover off of a forged Mk11, it is pretty obvious that there is a lot of unnecessary metal in the Ti versions. Think of the grams to be lost!

This is what Scubapro says, when I get my hands on one to take apart or decide to splurge and get one I will not have first hand knowledge. For my purposes, the differences are there but insufficient to spark an interest in acquiring one. If I were purchasing new, unless I got a nice price discount, I would want the Evo of course, I suppose, maybe.

What I want is a titanium Mark 11ET with a titanium C370T. Then I will bite.
If biting on an E version implies a now superfluous non-E - DIBS! :wink: :cool:

I actually prefer the original routing anyway.
 
If biting on an E version implies a now superfluous non-E - DIBS! :wink: :cool:

I actually prefer the original routing anyway.
Well, maybe if we all petition Scubapro for a titanium Mark 11 you can have my brass one ;) .

The hose routing when I first rigged it up, well, I thought, that is bizarre. And then I got over it because it just works.
 

Back
Top Bottom