dfx
Contributor

You know what's gonna happen? The US is gonna adopt SI eventually, and Mike here will claim that they've invented it. Mark my words.

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Indeed. And counting by threes isn't very "intuitive ".
Why can't we go 5 10 15 20? I'd assume if everybody would use metric then there will be no need to "match" any other system.
OK, besides switching to metric system completely. Of course a person who grew up measuring everything in inches and feet will be doing that practically the rest of his life. Even if you force him to switch to metric he will be dividing meters by 3, multiplying centimeters by 2.5, and dividing kilograms by 2, which will be inconvenient.. Fine.. understandable. But why not use bars? Why cling to PSI? You can't "visualize" pressure right? It's just a number on a gauge. You teach the new diver either bar or PSI - it will be no difference. Right? Although measuring everything in bars gives one cool advantage - it's roughly an atmosphere. Why not use bars with imperial system?
Until you want to do something useful with the measured values... like do some calculations... as has been mentioned dozens of times before in this thread...Interestingly I switched my computer to metric before entering the water for an 85min dive today... and didn't notice a difference at all. Dive wasn't any easier. My buddy - whose computer was set to imperial - and I still turned the dive at a half tank. Craziest thing, though... my half-tank in bar was the same as his half-tank in PSI.
Interestingly I switched my computer to metric before entering the water for an 85min dive today... and didn't notice a difference at all. Dive wasn't any easier. My buddy - whose computer was set to imperial - and I still turned the dive at a half tank. Craziest thing, though... my half-tank in bar was the same as his half-tank in PSI.
Other than that, there is really no difference in terms of being "harder" or "easier".
Until you want to do something useful with the measured values... like do some calculations... as has been mentioned dozens of times before in this thread...
Please demonstrate how converting from feet of depth to PSI of pressure is easier or at least equally easy than/as converting from metres of depth to bars/atmospheres of pressure.If your argument is that you can't make diving calculations with imperial values the problem lies with you. The math is not that hard. I can understand that you may feel metric is easier, for you. That's a personal opinion. It isn't however, a fact. Even if you mention it dozens of times it still does not become a fact.
That's because "easier" is a relative term relating to both a process and a user. The "easiness" depends on how those two interplay.