• Welcome to ScubaBoard


  1. Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

    Benefits of registering include

    • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
    • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
    • You can make this box go away

    Joining is quick and easy. Login or Register now by clicking on the button

Metal Impact AL72

Discussion in 'Tanks, Valves and Bands' started by mcg2015, Jan 5, 2019.

  1. mcg2015

    mcg2015 DIR Practitioner

    50
    1
    8
    Hello, I see DGX is now stocking AL72's made by Metal Impact. I'm not familiar with this company and am wondering if anyone has any experience with these and how they compare to Hy-Mark's (seems to be preferred AL72 on here) or Catalina's (I'm not sure if Luxfer makes or ever made of AL72)?

    I'm also wondering why AL72's aren't more popular for deco bottles. It seems to be an optimum size for a 50% bottle by my calculations. For a tech dive that can reasonably be done with just one deco bottle (i.e., about 30 minutes of deco), the average depth from 70 to surface is ~2 ata, SAC rate assumption of .75 cuft/min (I know this is much higher than mine and most people'd SAC for deco, but works for a conservative estimate), ends up requiring about 45 cu ft. Multiple that by 1.5 and you need about 68 cu ft of 50%. But most people I see on charters here in S. Fl are using 80's (myself included) or 40's (too small unless doing short deco or also carrying O2). Is it just because of availability issues or is there another reason to prefer an 80 over a 72 for the 70 ft bottle?
     
    Compressor likes this.
  2. Compressor

    Compressor ScubaBoard Supporter Staff Member ScubaBoard Supporter

    # of Dives: 1,000 - 2,499
    Location: NYS
    2,823
    1,291
    113
    Competition is good so while I can't answer your question, I'd hope that we get another manufacturer enter the market.
     
  3. DanaHunt

    DanaHunt DIR Practitioner

    # of Dives: I just don't log dives
    Location: Watertown, NY
    345
    103
    43
    Metal impact has been around for a few years. They were originally sold in xs scuba. I have two of their 50cf tanks. Nothing wrong with them. Xs scuba doesnt advertise them last I checked. Kinda diminishes my theory that MI was made by xs's Worthington acquisition.
     
  4. JackD342

    JackD342 Dive Shop

    # of Dives: 500 - 999
    Location: Highland Park, IL
    1,954
    1,052
    113
    DanaHunt likes this.
  5. runsongas

    runsongas Great White

    # of Dives: 500 - 999
    Location: California - Bay Area
    3,063
    1,097
    113
    why carry an al72 when you can cavefill a lp50?
     
  6. rjack321

    rjack321 Captain

    # of Dives: 1,000 - 2,499
    Location: Port Orchard, WA
    8,638
    2,526
    113
    because steel tanks make sucky stage bottles
     
    RyanT likes this.
  7. rjack321

    rjack321 Captain

    # of Dives: 1,000 - 2,499
    Location: Port Orchard, WA
    8,638
    2,526
    113
    80s are available second hand for cheap around here. I have 9 of them and they were all purchased used, stripped, tumbled, and hydroed for a lot less than new.
     
    Dark Wolf likes this.
  8. tomfcrist

    tomfcrist NAUI Instructor

    # of Dives: I'm a Fish!
    Location: Virginia, USA
    2,870
    1,754
    113

    A Lp50 at 3800 is still only 68 cubes. Cool for bailout, not as cool for anything else.
     
  9. W W Meixner

    W W Meixner Rebreather Pilot

    # of Dives: 500 - 999
    Location: Ontario Canada
    626
    420
    63
    Folks...

    I bought a Metal Impact 19 last year from DGX...excellent quality...inside/outside/thread cut/info stamping...

    The new long 72's will make a nice light set of doubles if Mark goes ahead and has band sets made up...

    Best...

    Warren...
    DSCF1170.JPG
     

Share This Page