griffon
Contributor
- Messages
- 320
- Reaction score
- 61
- # of dives
- 100 - 199
So far I like the Lynx but there are a few niggling things that are driving me batty in real word use. This is going to sound all negative because this what I'm focused on here, what I want to see different. I think Lynx one of the best and most innovative computers on the market and happy to own one . That said....
1. Compass access is almost useless, WAY to fidgety to go get a quick reading. I would like to be be able to either quick toggle, single left or right tap, to the compass screen, and back, or better have a alternate screen that keeps just the heading/general compass point up on main screen. I think this would be more useful to me then the big tank icon. Unless I missed it there is also no way way to lock a heading and counter heading indicator nor markers to shortest point mark (turn left to get back to heading fastest rout etc). I would consider all this to be pretty standard when contrasted to other comps with integrated compasses and it's just not there, why? The biggest issue for though is all the tapping and menus just to get in out. That is just not cool when diving IMO. It's like saying don't use this, take a analog too that you can just you know... look at.
2. No deep stops? WTF? really? come on, 2013 now...
3. The safety stop resetting instead of pausing if you dip down for a second. I find this really annoying. Either let the drift be settable or allow for a pause instead of reset option like the cobalt, or most others. There is nothing magical about 15 feet. Adding a little time for out of band would be fine too, but the reset thing is just irritating to me. I get the idea, I think the current safety stop implementation is at best a partial implementation of what should be a much more inclusive function set.
3. The hard time zero out at 700PSI. I don't like this and others have commented as well. Yes simple is good but, but this is over simplification. You don't collect enough tank info (size etc). This 700 psi time zero will mean something different every tank. If I want stupid simple, I will do the math myself. I really rather have the computer do the heavy lifting and not rely on just a add hock rule of thumb. Just my humble option on that approach. Frankly not a deal breaker for me, it just means I'm ignoring your reading and be diving my PSI and depth... I assume that will be normal so why bother having a untrusted data point on the screen. Perhaps I'm wrong but I think it's worth considering a change given the comments back on it overall.
4. Not always turning on.. twice now it has not turned on under water based on the pressure change. This needs some tuning, or maybe it's unit specific... I need more data of course. On the plus side if I turn it on under it dose the right thing and dose not force me out of the water to fix it . So nothing I'm that worried about.
So, please take this as constructive feedback from a customer rather then points or design choices that need to be defended. You really can't defend somthing that is annoying somebody who has to use the product anyway, it just serves to fuel the flames .
Patching and feature growth is good, and there is always room to improve and innovate no mater how solid a product launch you have.
I could just as easily written a love letter, but after a few dives, this what jumps out at me.
I won't start on the log software, other then to notes it's functional but feels pretty primitive and rough. Hopefully I can do direct import into divelog 5.0 soon.
Thanks
-Griffon
1. Compass access is almost useless, WAY to fidgety to go get a quick reading. I would like to be be able to either quick toggle, single left or right tap, to the compass screen, and back, or better have a alternate screen that keeps just the heading/general compass point up on main screen. I think this would be more useful to me then the big tank icon. Unless I missed it there is also no way way to lock a heading and counter heading indicator nor markers to shortest point mark (turn left to get back to heading fastest rout etc). I would consider all this to be pretty standard when contrasted to other comps with integrated compasses and it's just not there, why? The biggest issue for though is all the tapping and menus just to get in out. That is just not cool when diving IMO. It's like saying don't use this, take a analog too that you can just you know... look at.
2. No deep stops? WTF? really? come on, 2013 now...
3. The safety stop resetting instead of pausing if you dip down for a second. I find this really annoying. Either let the drift be settable or allow for a pause instead of reset option like the cobalt, or most others. There is nothing magical about 15 feet. Adding a little time for out of band would be fine too, but the reset thing is just irritating to me. I get the idea, I think the current safety stop implementation is at best a partial implementation of what should be a much more inclusive function set.
3. The hard time zero out at 700PSI. I don't like this and others have commented as well. Yes simple is good but, but this is over simplification. You don't collect enough tank info (size etc). This 700 psi time zero will mean something different every tank. If I want stupid simple, I will do the math myself. I really rather have the computer do the heavy lifting and not rely on just a add hock rule of thumb. Just my humble option on that approach. Frankly not a deal breaker for me, it just means I'm ignoring your reading and be diving my PSI and depth... I assume that will be normal so why bother having a untrusted data point on the screen. Perhaps I'm wrong but I think it's worth considering a change given the comments back on it overall.
4. Not always turning on.. twice now it has not turned on under water based on the pressure change. This needs some tuning, or maybe it's unit specific... I need more data of course. On the plus side if I turn it on under it dose the right thing and dose not force me out of the water to fix it . So nothing I'm that worried about.
So, please take this as constructive feedback from a customer rather then points or design choices that need to be defended. You really can't defend somthing that is annoying somebody who has to use the product anyway, it just serves to fuel the flames .
Patching and feature growth is good, and there is always room to improve and innovate no mater how solid a product launch you have.
I could just as easily written a love letter, but after a few dives, this what jumps out at me.
I won't start on the log software, other then to notes it's functional but feels pretty primitive and rough. Hopefully I can do direct import into divelog 5.0 soon.
Thanks
-Griffon