Whoa, I don't agree with much that Mike Ferrara says, but I agree with him on this issue.
Here's a thought: when ScubaPro authorizes someone to sell their products, then ScubaPro also inherits the liability for any problems. In effect, they supervise the sales of their equipment.
ScubaPro can confidently stand up and say that the product bought from an unauthorized source may have been altered or worked on, or be a piece that ScubaPro deemed not for sale. So, by not being allowed to have a hand in the sale of their equipment, ScubaPro denies the ability for anyone to nail them for faulty equipment.
The issue with the S-650's is a case in point, and again I defer to Mike Ferrara. It's a good point, will LP sell you an S-650 that they HAVE to unload, because they surely can't ship it back to SP, knowing that SP has stopped selling that particular type because of a known deficiency?
Prices be damned, lawyers cost a lot! Sp knows this. Is LP playing the lottery in reverse with the S-650's?
I do not believe that these are excuses for SP. Authorized retailers are simply sound business principles in limiting litigation in a 'sue happy' society.
Colin Berry
And quit avoiding an issue by nailing a guy for bad spelling. We've all done it. This isn't a resume!!