What are the differences?I agree that Janos Molnar is a great place but their rules and procedures are a bit specific and difficult to apply in other locations, I would choose other place for initial training
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
What are the differences?I agree that Janos Molnar is a great place but their rules and procedures are a bit specific and difficult to apply in other locations, I would choose other place for initial training
What are the differences?
- Very thick cave line where you cannot use normal cave markers but you can pull it without problems
- No real jumps and navigation decisions during your dives because of the permanent line system in place
- Guide is compulsory by law, all the dives are kind of trust me dives because you can't use markers (the permanent arrows will let you exit the cave in an emergency but it still feels weird at the beginning)
- Few real restrictions/tighter passages, you won't get the estimate where you fit naturally and where you don't
- Their entanglement avoidance rules are great for doubles but inefficient for less used systems like sidemount or chestmount CCR (not dangerous but definitely annoying when they force you to have the line exactly below you to entangle/roll off your oxygen valve on your CCR, might change once FX becomes more wide spread there)
IANTD, we'd be doing intro to cave and full cave at once (Alongside advanced nitrox to cover deco obligations due to repeated long dives)
Not the biggest fan of zero to hero, but it's also partially our own responsibility to be smart about steadily building up experience
Zero to Hero is an absolutely horrible idea unless you are an exceptionally skilled and heavily trained diver already. Being fundies tech would not be what I would consider good enough. There are a couple instructors here who really push it, but I wholeheartedly disagree unless it is a very specifically proficient diver. The average cave diver lasts 3 years or less, those who do zero to hero I find locally almost always fall into that category.I am not either but for somebody like me who has to travel for a very long distance and have to spend lots of $$$ to get there,
One of the most important parts of cave training is becoming a thinking diver. Rushing through classes will likely leave you with learned behaviors for emergency scenarios, but you're not building comfort, confidence, and the experience needed to really be a thinking diver who isn't just reacting. Taking baby steps by taking a class then going and diving really reinforces those skills through experience. I understand that cave diving is expensive when you have to travel, but trying to save money doing a zero to hero course is far from ideal.
The line is as thick as my little finger, no standard marker will hold there except an oldfashioned clothespin. Maybe they have some custom made markers for their students or use a standard line somewhere aside to practice, I have no idea. I only did fun diving there, no training.Thanks
So you can't use your own markers and practice putting them? Not ideal
+1 for both, especially for having just one student in the class. Having to adapt to failures and imperfections of other students makes a massive difference.Zero-to-hero is doable, but it will require so much pre-training training and post-training diving, that most people who live far away from caves won't find it practical.
And I am with @rddvet on having another student in class. You have no idea how quickly new cave students will make a bad situation out of a good one.
This is very accurate and one of the things I ask the students to question their instructor on. A good instructor can usually find a buddy or experienced diver to join the team. Obviously that's not always the case, but the good instructors will bust their butt to find a buddy as opposed to doing 1:1.+1 for both, especially for having just one student in the class. Having to adapt to failures and imperfections of other students makes a massive difference.
I think it's the easiest criteria to vet an instructor: just ask if they are willing to teach 1:1 and discard anyone who says yes for an intro/full cave course (it probably does have a place for extreme exploration mentoring). It's actually shocking how many (Insta)famous instructors and shops teach like 1:1 just to get some cash in at the cost of students.