LetonPower NEW Lights (Shark Series) - I bought some and.....

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Cymro99

Registered
Messages
15
Reaction score
5
Location
Boston
# of dives
200 - 499
I used a couple of LetonPower TurboS Pro lights on a dive trip to Mainland Belize last year and again on trips to the Belizean reefs and also to St Lucia and the islands on the way to the grenadines. The lights were reliable, held a long charge and the quality of the light given the modest price was pretty remarkable.
Here's an example of using a pair of them on a camera tray in some pretty murky conditions and with a crazy amout of surge (sorry about the motion, my legs were working overtime to try and keep me stable!) ;-)


At the end of the trip on the outer reefs, the local DM was admiring the lights and was planning to get some. When we looked at the cost of getting them to him in Belize (outrageous import tax) I gifted the pair to him. As you can imagine he was overjoyed.

I've been looking for months for a replacement set and when googling to see if there were new lights coming out from the various manufacturers and then saw the post here about the SEAL lights. Given my experience with LetonPowers lights (and Amazon's favourable return policy if I didn't like them!) I bought a Shark CX (top of their range) and also a SHARK CX.

Spolier alert - I LOVE these new lights and consider them WELL worth the step up in price over the TurboS-Pro I previously used.

In the family, we still have a TurboS Pro (my son's) and so to help others understand the differences in physical size and light output, I have included it in a few of the pictures in this thread so you can see the size difference.


IMG_0649.jpeg


The new lights are packaged much like the previous generation TurboS. The same case but with the padding molded in a way that suits the new light.
In the image above, TurboS on the left and new Shark lights on the right.

You can start to see the differences between them when we look at the LED ends on these things.

IMG_0650.jpeg


You can see that the TurboS used a number of discrete LEDs, the Shark CB (6000 lumen) used a large central emitter for the bulk of its power with peripheral pairs or trios of LEDs adding the nuances of color to modify temp or blue or red. The Shark CX (8000 Lumen) has large LED light wells on the perimiter for the bulk light output while color shift LEDs are central..

One thing to note here is that LetonPower has broken away from the manufacturers that claim 'Gazillion' Lumen output numbers that defy logic and science. These lights should be close(R) to their advertised output (so it's not really a step down in output from the TurboS, just a new, rational approach to output from their marketing department. I can confirm this as I asked the company this specific question as the new lights seemed a downgrade in output from the previous generation.

One thing that is REALLY noticable when you place these emitting heads side by side (below) is the very significant increase in the diameter of the dispersion lens. The two new lights are miuch bigger in this regard than the previous generation; I assume to allow a better lens and dispersion (more later)
IMG_0651.jpeg




In Hand, the new lights fit a little nicer than the previous generation, but that might depend on the size of your hand,
IMG_0652.jpeg
IMG_0655.jpeg



I will continue in the next post so that I can continue to add pics
 
Here's a couple of pictures of the Shark CX and CB side by side.
Externally, they seem identical with the exception of the LED emitters described previously

IMG_0656.jpeg
IMG_0657.jpeg
IMG_0658.jpeg




And here's a short video of the light in my hand so you get an idea.

 
OK, Now on to the important stuff - how do they perform.

I won't have the ability to get them wet until after the holidays but at least I wanted to get some subjective assesment of output relative to the TurboS and aso compared to each other (6k vs 8k lumens)

One thing that's REALLY important to me is whether video lights have pronounced hot spots and how broad and diffuse the dispersion of the light is. Beam spread can be shown pretty easily on a flat surface (as long as care is taken to account for the shape of the light body and so that both lenses are at 90 degrees to the surface on which the light is being projected)

The two Shark Lights performed similarly as shown here (the camera exaggerates the contrast, the beam presented to the eye as uniform and broad)

IMG_0666.jpeg


Here's a closeup - nice dispersion


IMG_0671.jpeg



I also wanted to compare these to the TurboS to see if the broader head and larger lens (and those LED wells?) improved the dispersion over the previous generation.


Here's the TurboS Pro vs the Shark

IMG_0669.jpeg
IMG_0670.jpeg


The Turbo S definitely has a hot spot that's not evident in the latest version
 
Finally, here's a couple of videos of the color cycling in the light and also cycling through the main light's power levels and color temps





This site and community has been unbelievably helpful to me and so I hope the time and effort to post this is demonstration of my appreciation.

Hope this helps
Ed
 

Back
Top Bottom